Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Topic: the dangers of social media assignment
Group members’ names: Mathew / William / Jim / Jacob / Abigail / MadisonThe topic of our presentation The dangers of social media. Please when you write the requirements, put the name of the members and talk as what we did in the group meeting.
Your responses in this log address the questions that will contribute to the “Group Process” section in your final presentation. You will individually respond to these questions in this assignment, then, you will have a team meeting wherein you discuss what you each wrote in this, and other, log(s). Then, consolidate the information and determine what you will share with the class.
Group development, climate, and culture. How did your team come together in terms of Tuckman’s Group Development Model (Engleberg & Wynn Chapters 2 & 3). What are the formal and informal norms that developed in the group, and how were they developed (E&W Chapter 2)? This might include discussions of the following:
Expectations of how the group interacted with one another (e.g., how formal or informal, use of video, etc.) and with those outside of the team (with the instructor and with community members or organizations) (E&W Chapters 3 & 6)
Group roles (E&W Chapter 3). Which roles emerged in the process of working together; who filled them, how, and when? Name names here. Try to identify at least one role for each person, whether it be formal or informal, task or maintenance (or disruptive, but that could get messy, so be careful about accusing others of disruptive role behavior).
The process(es) the group followed to make decisions (E&W Chapters 9, 10, & 11 and Beebe & Masterson Ch 11Preview the document)
2. Group task completion. This discussion might include the following:
What were the barriers to completing the task and how did you overcome them? How could you have done so more effectively?What tools (e.g., communication tools, etc.) did you use to complete the task (E&W Chapters 6, 7, 8, 9 and B&M Ch 11)? Why did you choose them?
Satisfaction with task completionNOTE: During this meeting in which you share what you wrote, you may find there are some unresolved conflicts or misunderstandings you wish to discuss. I encourage you to take advantage of this opportunity to learn something about others’ perspectives and about yourself. Speaking in a way that takes responsibility for your thoughts and feelings will be extremely helpful in making these conversations productive. When describing another person’s behavior, try saying “When you (did or said …) I felt (describe how you felt about their behavior using emotions not thoughts) because (describe how their behavior affected you).”
For example, “When you did not call to tell us you would miss the meeting I felt frustrated because we were unable to make a final decision without your input which delays our progress on this assignment.” Or, if there is something for which you wish to apologize, a good way to approach this is to acknowledge that you did something wrong, sincerely apologize and offer amends. For example, “I know that I could have made more of an effort to reach out and let you know what was going on, and I apologize for leaving you in the dark. What ca
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!