Product that Addresses a Gaps within a Healthcare Organization
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
ies in function, size, and type. Although the amount of equipment is usually
adequate to the workload of the unit, there may be times when equipment is used by different providers in different locations across the unit and at different times. In those situations, locating and tracking equipment may become problematic. In fact, many nurses believe that inadequate unit inventory management is one of the top irritants affecting the provision of nursing care at bedside (Belander et al., 2018). Thus, making equipment management more effective would enhance nurses ability to provide timely and effective care. In addition, dynamic unit environment and differences among health care providers in care activities, time spent with patients and movement patterns create additional challenges associated with equipment use (Harrod et al., 2019). Therefore, an example of gap identified within a healthcare organization is a lack of technology to locate and track equipment used by different providers and shifts in multiple location across the units.
In this regard, using a tracking system is a solution that presents an opportunity to enhance services and care within a healthcare organization. A study by Yoo et al. (2018) found that the use of real-time equipment tracking systems introduced by a hospital was rated by nurses as helpful and moderately successful. Moreover, Bluetooth Low Energy(BLE)/Wi-Fi asset tracking system used during the study is considered a widely used low-cost solution (Yoo et al., 2016). Therefore, BLE-based equipment tracking system can be considered an efficient solution for addressing the identified gap a lack of technology to locate and track the equipment within a healthcare organization.
Prior to considering implementing BLE tracking system, it is worth taking a close look at start up cost, operating cost, and revenue associated with the use of this system. For instance, while Bluetooth reader can cost $100-200, RFID reader will cost between $1,000 and $5,000. Upfront cost (purchasing and setting up) of BLE tracking system is $26,000. In comparison, upfront cost of Wi-Fi and RFID tracking systems is up to $130,000 (What is Bluetooth RTLS, n.d.). Operating cost: while first-year costs of implementing a 1,000-unit BLE-based asset tracking system is around $11,900, first-year costs of implementing RFID-based tracking system can easily reach $39,000 (Augur, 2017). Therefore, based on the comparative analysis of implementation and operating costs, BLE asset tracking solution can be considered a cost-efficient project.
Augur, H. (2017). Asset tracking upgrade: Bluetooth Low Energy can help! Kontakt. https://kontakt.io/blog/frustrating-asset-tracking-system-bluetooth-beacons-can-help/
Belanger, V., Beaulieu, M., Landry, S., & Morales, P. (2018). Where to locate medical supplies
in nursing units: An exploratory study. Supply Chain Forum, 19(1), 81-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2018.1433438
Harrod, M., Petersen, L., Weston, L.E., Gregory, L., Mayer, J., Samore, M.H., Drews, F.A., &
Krein, S.L. (2019). Understanding workflow and personal protective equipment challenges across different healthcare personnel roles. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 69(S3), S185-S191. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz527
Yoo, S., Kim, S., Kim, E., Jung, E., Lee, L., & Hwang, H. (2018). Real-time location system-
based asset tracking in the healthcare field: Lessons learned from a feasibility study. BM
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!