NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Presentation Guidelines
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to (a) explore and present an information technology used in the healthcare system that supports the patient care experience and (b) develop the skills of team communication, collaboration, and production.
Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Describe patient‐care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO 1)
CO 5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO 5)
CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)
CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)
Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.
Total points possible: 240 points
Preparing the assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
- For this team project, students will be assigned by faculty into teams of three to five individuals depending upon class size.
- Teams will receive a project grade based on assessment by the project rubric, which will then be applied to each individual’s grade for the project minus points for lack of participation in the development or presentation of the project.
- The team leader will make all dropbox submissions for the course so that the:
- TURNITIN similarity index will not pick up inadvertent self‐plagiarism from another team member’s submission.
- Course faculty will have only one submission to review and grade.
- Prepare a PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes between 25‐30 slides, excluding the title and reference slides.
- Speaker Notes
- Outline and “script” the presentation for online students.
o Online students’ speaker notes should include the name of the student who researched and presented the slide information.
o Campus students follow the guidelines of your course instructor.
- Scholarly writing and APA guidelines should be followed as applicable to PowerPoint slides.
- Cite sources in APA format in the applicable slides and include the APA formatted reference in your reference list slide(s) ‐ minimum 6 references.
- Spelling, grammar, and punctuation apply even in bullet points and speaker slides (e.g., quotation marks, italics, verb tense, etc.).
- Copyright and plagiarism guidelines apply.
- Each team will be assigned a healthcare information systems technology (e.g., Computerized Physician Order Entry, Electronic Health Record, Electronic Medical Record, etc.) by the course instructor. For that technology, include the following discussions in the presentation:
- Introduction of Technology and Team – 20 points/8%
- Title slide identifies the assigned technology.
- Title slide introduces team members.
NR360_RUA_Technology_Presentation _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 1
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Presentation Guidelines
- Presentation provides an introduction that: o Describes the technology
- States a purpose for use of the technology in healthcare
- Establishes the professional tone for the presentation
b. History and Current Use – 30 points/14% Sarah Colley • Describe significant findings that prompted the development of the technology. This is my section
- Discuss the history and current use of the technology in healthcare.
- Describe three goals of this technology’s implementation. c. Impact on Healthcare and Nursing – 40 points/16%
- Discuss impact on professional nursing practice related to:
- Patient safety
- Quality of care measures/monitoring o Risk management
o Privacy, confidentiality, and security of patient data o Effect on population within the region
o Ethical practice
o Compliance with legal and regulatory mandates o Organizational infrastructure and operations
- Support discussions with examples & data from current evidence-based resources.
- Three Advantages and Disadvantages – 40 points/16%
- Patient’s perspective (e.g., patient outcomes, safety, patient/family satisfaction)
- Nurse’s perspective (improves/hinders job efficiency/safety)
- Healthcare organization’s perspective (regulatory compliance, financial, etc.)
- Controversy, Issues, Challenges, and Regulatory Implications – 30 points/14%
- How might issues surrounding the chosen technology be addressed/solved?
- Provide statistically significant data or evidence to support your findings.
- Summary – 20 points/8%
- Key points
- Discoveries/surprises
- Lessons learned by the team
- Team Project Evaluation – 40 points/16%
- Place & discuss the following questions and responses in the slides(s) following the summary slide and prior to the reference slide(s).
- How did the team function well? (e.g., team strengths, team balance, etc.)
- What problems did you have interacting as a team? (e.g., team weaknesses, outside challenges, technology, etc.)
- What specific actions would you recommend to future teams to help them interact, function, and collaborate successfully?
- Presentation, Scholarly Writing, and APA format – 20 points/8%
- 25-30 PowerPoint slides with speaker notes (excluding title & reference slides) Speaker notes
- Submitted to Dropbox/Turnitin by Team leader only
- Speaker Notes outline and “script” the presentation for online students.
- Online students’ speaker notes should include the name of the student who researched and presented the slide information.
- Campus students follow the guidelines of your course instructor.
- Copyright and plagiarism guidelines apply.
- Scholarly writing and current APA guidelines should be followed as applicable to PowerPoint slides.
- Cite sources in APA format in the applicable slides and include the APA formatted reference in your reference list slide(s)‐ minimum 6 references.
- Spelling, grammar, and punctuation apply even in bullet points and speaker slides (e.g., quotation marks, italics, verb tense, etc.).
NR360_RUA_Technology_Presentation _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 2
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Presentation Guidelines
For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar), visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library.
Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.
Continued Next Page…
NR360_RUA_Technology_Presentation _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 3
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Presentation Guidelines
Grading Rubric
Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.
Assignment Section and Highest Level of High Level of Satisfactory Level Unsatisfactory Section Not Required Criteria Performance Performance of Performance Level of Present in Paper (Points possible/% of total points available) Performance Introduction of Technology & Team 20 points 18 points 16 points 7 points 0 points (20 points/8%) • Title slide identifies the assigned technology. All criteria are All criteria are 3 criteria are fully met 1-2 criteria fully met Criteria not present • Title slide introduces team members. described described concisely • Introduction describes the technology. comprehensively. but not • Introduction states a purpose for use of the comprehensively (or) technology in healthcare. one element is not • Introduction establishes the professional tone for addressed. the presentation. History & Current Use 30 points 26 points 23 points 10 points 0 points (30 points/14%) • Describe significant findings that prompted the All criteria are All criteria are 2 criteria fully met 1 criteria fully met Criteria not present development of the technology. described described concisely • Discuss the history and current use of the comprehensively with but not technology in healthcare. consideration of comprehensively. • Describe three goals of this technology’s alternate Some elements of implementation. perspectives or alternate presentation of perspectives or supporting data. presentation of supporting data are present. Impact on Healthcare & Nursing 40 points 35 points 30 points 14 points 0 points (40 points/16%) Discuss impact on professional nursing practice related All criteria are All criteria are 6 criteria fully met 3 criteria fully met Criteria not present to: described described concisely • Patient safety comprehensively with but not • Quality of care measures/monitoring consideration of comprehensively. • Risk management alternate Some elements of NR360_RUA_Technology_Presentation _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 4 NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Presentation Guidelines
• Privacy, confidentiality, and security of patient data perspectives or alternate • Effect on population within the region presentation of perspectives or • Ethical practice supporting data. presentation of • Compliance with legal and regulatory mandates supporting data are • Organizational infrastructure and operations present.
- Support discussions with examples & data from current evidence-based resources
Three Advantages & Disadvantages 40 points 35 points 30 points 14 points 0 points (40 points/16%) Three advantages and disadvantages are presented for: All criteria are All criteria are 2 criteria fully met 1 criteria fully met Criteria not present • Patient’s perspective (e.g., patient outcomes, safety, described described concisely patient/family satisfaction) comprehensively with but not • Nurse’s perspective (improves/hinders job consideration of comprehensively. efficiency/safety) alternate Some elements of • Healthcare organization’s perspective (regulatory perspectives or alternate compliance, financial, etc.) presentation of perspectives or supporting data. presentation of supporting data are present. Controversy/Issues/Challenges/Regulatory Implications 30 points 26 points 23 points 10 points 0 points (30 points/14%) • Controversy, issues, challenges, and regulatory All criteria are All criteria are 2 criteria fully met 1 criteria fully met Criteria not present implications are addressed. described described concisely • The presentation answers the question, “how might comprehensively with but not issues surrounding the chosen technology be consideration of comprehensively. addressed/solved?” alternate Some elements of • Statistically significant data or evidence is provided perspectives or alternate to support the findings. presentation of perspectives or supporting data. presentation of supporting data are present. Summary 20 points 18 points 15 points 7 points 0 points (20 points/8%) NR360_RUA_Technology_Presentation _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 5 NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Presentation Guidelines
• The presentation provides a summary. All criteria are All criteria are 3 criteria fully met 2 criteria fully met Criteria not present • The summary reinforces all key points. described described concisely • The summary discusses any discoveries made or comprehensively with but not surprises the team encountered during research and consideration of comprehensively. preparation for the presentation. alternate Some elements of • Includes lessons learned. perspectives or alternate presentation of perspectives or supporting data. presentation of supporting data are present.
Team Project Evaluation 40 points 35 points 30 points 14 points 0 points (40 points/16%) A team project evaluation is provided and includes the All criteria are All criteria are 3 criteria fully met 2 criteria fully met Criteria not present following criteria. Each of the following questions and described described concisely responses must be present on the slides following the comprehensively with but not summary slide, but before the reference slide(s): consideration of comprehensively. • How the team functioned well (e.g., team strengths, alternate Some elements of team balance, etc.). perspectives or alternate • Problems the team encountered in interacting as a presentation of perspectives or team (e.g., team weaknesses, outside challenges, supporting data. presentation of technology, etc.). supporting data are • Specific actions you would recommend to future present. teams to help them interact, function, and collaborate successfully. Presentation, Scholarly Writing, & APA Format 20 points 18 points 16 points 7 points 0 points (20 points/8%) The presentation format, scholarly writing, and APA All criteria are met. Student provides 6 Student provides 6 or 5 criteria fully met 4 or fewer criteria format must meet the following criteria: scholarly references fewer scholarly met • 25-30 PowerPoint slides with speaker notes and at least 7 criteria references and 6 or (excluding title & reference slides) fully met. more criteria fully • Submitted to Dropbox/Turnitin by Team leader only met. • Speaker Notes outline and “script” the presentation for online students. NR360_RUA_Technology_Presentation _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 6 NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Presentation Guidelines
- Online students’ speaker notes include the name of the student who researched and presented the slide information.
- Copyright and plagiarism guidelines correctly applied
- Scholarly writing and current APA guidelines are followed as applicable to PowerPoint slides.
- Sources cited in APA format in the applicable slides and include the APA formatted reference in the reference list slide(s) ‐ minimum 6 references to meet criteria.
- Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are correct, even in bullet points and speaker slides (e.g., quotation marks, italics, verb tense, etc.).
- Additional criteria provided by course instructor is met.
Total Points Possible = 240 points
NR360_RUA_Technology_Presentation _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 7
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!