BUS 5110 Group Project Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
BUS 5110 Group Project:
For this activity, you have been hired as a team of consultants on a multi-year basis for a global washer and dryer manufacturer. They currently offer two core washer and dryer sets: a high-end model and an economical model. You are tasked to complete several calculations and present your findings to the company stakeholders. You may use any presentation software (Google Slides, Prezi, PowerPoint, etc.) and your completed presentation should consist of 8 – 12 slides. A copy of the final presentation will be submitted by each member of the group in Unit 7.
- For your first assignment, management has provided the following revenue and cost information:
High End Set Economical Set Sales price $3,500 per unit $1,000 per unit Labor $875 per unit $250 per unit Materials $1,400 per unit $300 per unit Direct fixed costs $25,000 per month $16,500 per month Allocated fixed costs $85,000 per month $85,000 per month
They want a better understanding of their business to make budgeting and sales goals decisions and have asked you to determine their:
- Break-even quantities for each product line
- Break-even quantities to earn $500,000 per year margin on the high-end line (at the current sales price)
- Break-even quantities to earn $300,000 per year margin on the economical line (at the current sales price)
They expect the product lines to fully absorb the costs allocated to them.
Once you have determined these amounts, they have asked that you present the information, describe how you performed your calculations, and explain what the results mean.
- Later, the company is considering the purchase of machinery and equipment to set up a line to produce a combination washer-dryer. They have given you the following information to analyze the project on a 5-year timeline:
- Initial cash outlay is $150,000, no residual value.
- Sales price is expected to be $2,250 per unit, with $595 per unit in labor expense and $795 per unit in materials.
- Direct fixed costs are estimated to run $20,750 per month.
- Cost of capital is 8%, and the required rate of return is 10%.
- They will incur all operational costs in Year 1, though sales are expected to be 55% of break-even.
- Break-even (considering only direct fixed costs) is expected to occur in Year 2.
- Variable costs will increase 2% each year, starting in Year 3.
- Sales are estimated to grow by 10%, 15%, and 20% for years 3 – 5.
They have asked you to calculate:
- the product’s contribution margin
- break-even quantity
- NPV
- IRR
Once you have determined these amounts, they have asked that you present the information, describe how you performed your calculations, and explain what the results mean.
After you have completed the calculations and presented your work, management makes the investment. Explain how the project analyses do or do not support this decision. In either case, what are the factors that should have been considered in management’s decision?
- After the combo washer-dryer has been in production for a few years, you are asked to perform another analysis. You must evaluate the performance of all three product lines as management is concerned with the viability of the washer-dryer combination product. They provide you with the latest annual information by product:
High End Set Economical W/D Combo Total Set Sales $4,700,000 $4,060,000 $880,000 $9,640,000 Labor $(1,250,000) $(1,015,000) $(235,000) $(2,500,000) Materials $(1,885,000) $(1,220,000) $(315,000) $(3,420,000) Direct fixed costs $(325,000) $(220,000) $(250,000) $(795,000) Allocated fixed costs $(650,000) $(650,000) $(650,000) $(1,950,000) Net Income $590,000 $955,000 $(570,000) $975,000
You are asked to perform an analysis to determine whether to drop or keep the washer-dryer combination product and present your findings, including the steps taken to make your determination. You are also asked to evaluate if the costing methodology is appropriate and, if not, recommend alternative methods.
Please describe the circumstances of the case study and make the required recommendations. Explain your approaches to the problems, perform relevant calculations and analyses, and justify your recommendations. Evaluate the results and explain what each calculated value means. Ensure your work and conclusions are thoroughly supported.
Superior presentations will:
- Describe the circumstances.
- Perform all calculations correctly.
- Articulate how the calculations were performed.
- Evaluate the computations and explain their meanings.
- Make recommendations, supported by well thought-out rationale and considering various factors that could impact the decisions.
You have been provided with two areas in the course to discuss and collaborate: A group discussion forum and a wiki collaboration area. Group members and instructors have access to these areas and can see the discussions and the work you do within these areas. This communication is not graded. You are also free to use tools outside of the course, such as Google Docs, Yammer, etc. if your group chooses to do so.
your presentation is due in Unit 7. Be sure to use APA formatting in your presentation and ensure it looks professional. As a reminder, the Purdue OWL website can be accessed here: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!