Tulane the Robert T Stafford Disaster Relief & Emergency Assistance Act Homework
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Question Description
+PLEASE VIEW THE ATTACHED POWERPOINT SLIDES 8-16 FOR HOW TO CONDUCT A POLICY ANALYSIS. THE INTENDED POLICY FOR ANALYSIS IS THE POLICY INDICATED IN THE QUESTION TOPIC ABOVE. PLEASE FOLLOW THE WRITING PROMPT, POWERPOINT, AND RUBRIC. THANK YOU :)!
Select a policy–either within the United States or internationally – that addresses preparation or responses to disasters. Complete a detailed policy analysis, addressing the following:
- Write an assessment of the policy analysis or proposal and the need it addresses
- Provide a description of the policy, including historical background and an explanation of the context where the policy is enacted as it relates to the disaster management cycle
- Provide a rationale for the policy
- Provide an explanation of how the policy supports the goals of the community
- Describe the main components of the policy and how the components address the problem and the stage of the disaster management cycle. Specify any specific tools or resources used (e.g., economic or funding mechanisms)
- Explain how the policy intends to achieve its goals to demonstrate its effectiveness
- Explain how the policy addresses issues of diversity or areas where diversity is lacking; in particular, what are the underlying social and political values the policy adheres to?
- Detail any issues and challenges in implementation
- Describe the policy’s plan for evaluating the policy, or offering specified policy alternatives
- Alternatively, if there is not a policy that is already in existence that interests you, you may suggest the implementation of a new policy, using the critical elements specified.
Your assignment should be 12 to 15 double-spaced pages in length. Please include appropriate scholarly references and a title page. Assignment should be free of grammatical errors and all references should be cited in APA format.
SOWK 7075 – Session 14 – Final Paper
SOWK 7075 – Session 14 – Final Paper
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assessment
47.0 pts
Excellent
Writes a cogent and sophisticated assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal and the need it addresses
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Writes a brief assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal and the need it addresses
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Writes a brief assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal and the need it addresses, but assessment lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not write a brief assessment of the client’s mental health status, policy analysis, or program proposal
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Context and Background
47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides a sophisticated explanation of the context of the treatment, policy, or program as it relates to the disaster management cycle, including relevant historical background
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Describes the context of the treatment, policy, or program as it relates to the disaster management cycle, including relevant historical background
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Describes the context of the treatment, policy, or program as it relates to the disaster management cycle, including relevant historical background, but description lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not describe the context of the treatment, policy, or program
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Rationale
47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides sophisticated rationale for the treatment policy or program
Provides a sophisticated explanation of how the intervention, policy, or program supports the goals of the individual community. Provides in-depth explanation of the main components of the intervention, policy, or treatment and how they address the disaster cycle. Tools or resources used are appropriate in supporting the intervention, policy, or program.
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Provides rationale for the treatment, policy, or program.; Provides an explanation of how the intervention, policy, or program supports the goals of the individual community. Describes the main components of the intervention, policy, or treatment and how they address the disaster cycle. Specify tools or resources used.
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provides rationale for the treatment, policy, or program, but rationale does not address the disaster cycle, lacks detail, or contains inaccuracies
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not provide rationale for the treatment, policy, or program
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Effectiveness
47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides an insightful explanation for how the treatment, policy or program demonstrates its effectiveness
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Explains how the treatment, policy or program demonstrates its effectiveness
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Explains how the treatment, policy or program demonstrates its effectiveness, but explanation lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not explain how the treatment, policy, or program demonstrates its effectiveness
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Diversity
47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides an insightful and thoughtful explanation for how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Explains how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Explains how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity, but explanation lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not explain how the treatment, policy, or program addresses or fails to address issues of diversity
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Challenges
47.0 pts
Excellent
Offers a sophisticated explanation of any issues and challenges faced in implementation
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Details any issues and challenges in implementation
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Details any issues and challenges in implementation, but description is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not detail any issues and challenges in implementation
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluation
47.0 pts
Excellent
Provides a cogent explanation of the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program, and how it may be improved
35.0 pts
Satisfactory
Describes the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program, and how it may be improved
30.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Describes the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program, but description lacks detail or contains inaccuracies
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not describe the plan for evaluating the treatment, policy, or program
47.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics
21.0 pts
Excellent
References appropriate scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Assignment is free of grammatical errors and all references are cited in APA format.
15.0 pts
Satisfactory
References appropriate scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Assignment is free of grammatical errors and all references are cited in APA format.
10.0 pts
Needs Improvement
References appropriate scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan. Minor grammatical errors. Some references are not cited in APA format.
0.0 pts
Not Evident
Does not reference scholarly work to provide justification for treatment plan
Major grammatical errors.
21.0 pts
Total Points: 350.0
RUBRIC
Quality of Response No Response Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!