The Known Equation Assignment Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The Known Equation
Students reflect on “the known equation” and its relevance and real-world application. They consider the value of performance assessment and how what they have learned will be of benefit to students.
- Create a 4- to 6-page paper (not including the title and references pages) in a Word document for your response. Use APA format for the paper and in-text citations.
- Create a title page and references page in APA format.
- Develop an introduction and conclusion for your paper.
- Follow the step directions to complete the assignment.
Step 1. Investigate
1- Research either state or national standards and best practices in performance assessment for mathematical concepts related to equations.2- List the standards by number, name, and description.
3- Summarize the best practices. How do standards and best practices serve as guides?
Step 2. Design
1- Applying standards and best practices, design a performance assessment for one of the concepts covered in the course assignments.2- Write out the steps of the performance assessment, so someone else could implement it.
3- What appeals to you about your assessment design? How will the assessment enable students to connect the algorithm, concept, and application of an equation?
Step 3. Reflect
Reflect on the value of performance assessment to problem solving using equations.Consider the ideas of real-world application, authentic learning, misconceptions, and meaning-making in your response.
Success Stories/Pikes Peak Steel, LLC Works with Colorado State University OSHA Consultation Services and Stays
SHARP
Company: Pikes Peak Steel
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
NAICS Code: 332312 – Fabricated Structural Metal Manufacturing
Employees: 32
Pikes Peak Steel, LLC, is a growing structural steel fabrication plant, located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The company provides steel products to commercial contractors in the western United States and to homebuilders in Colorado Springs and the surrounding region. Their products range from beams, saddles, railings, and stairs to structural steel and bridges.
Initially, the company was competing for
large projects, but it was plagued with injuries. At one point, their total recordable case (TRC) and days away, restricted, and transferred (DART) rates were 20.0 and 10.0, respectively. These high injury rates led to expensive workers’ compensation insurance premiums and other direct and indirect costs. Pikes Peak Steel knew they needed to lower these costs.
In 2005, the company invited Colorado State University (CSU) OSHA Consultation Services consultants to conduct a safety and health survey of their facility. It was at that time Glen Carter, the company owner, made the conscious decision to focus on safety in the same way that he approached quality. The consultants did not know it at the time, but this visit would be the starting point of what would become an incredibly successful safety story.
In the beginning, the company focused on what it knew: training programs and hazard analysis. The consultants from CSU OSHA Consultation Services were crucial at this stage. They guided Pikes Peak Steel through ‘WHAT’ needed to be done and ‘HOW’ to do it. The consultants acted as coaches and provided technical advice and support. With their help, Carter developed new safety policies and programs. He discussed the goals of these new programs with his key personnel and stated, “When the company owner cares, everybody cares.” This approach created a focus and uniform effort to get all personnel working in the same direction.
In 2008, Pikes Peak Steel earned its first Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Safety and Health Achievement Recognition Program (SHARP), award and demonstrated that when businesses make workplace safety a priority, people take notice. Since then, the company has consistently participated in SHARP. This program recognizes small business employers who have used OSHA On-Site Consultation Program services and operate exemplary safety and health programs. Acceptance into SHARP is an achievement of status that singles the company out among its business peers as a model for worksite safety and health.
The OSHA On-Site Consultation Program offers no-cost and confidential occupational safety and health services to small and medium-sized businesses in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and several U.S. territories, with priority given to high-hazard worksites. On-Site Consultation services are separate from enforcement and do not result in penalties or citations. Consultants from state agencies or universities, such as CSU OSHA Consultation Services, work with employers to identify workplace hazards, provide advice for compliance with OSHA standards, and assist in establishing and improving safety and health programs.
Participating in SHARP was positive reinforcement and provided the incentive for continued improvement. Carter noted, “With the help of the CSU consultants, the safety program continued to evolve.” He viewed the initial SHARP certification as “THE critical step in the company’s safety successes.”
Pikes Peak Steel has achieved several incredible milestones:
Five consecutive SHARP participant renewals, most recently in March 2019. Today, the company boasts a workplace safety program that has incurred only one recordable injury in over 7 years (353,000 hours). To participate in SHARP, a company must have injury and illness rates below the national average. From 2015 through 2017, Pikes Peak Steel’s total recordable case (TRC) rate was 1.3, and their days away, restricted, and transferred (DART) rate was 1.3. During this period for NAICS code 332312, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the industry average TRC rate was 5.23, and the industry average DART rate was 2.63. [Note: For 2018, Pikes Peak Steel’s TRC and DART rates returned to zero. However, BLS injury and illness data are not available for 2018.] This successful record has occurred despite the inherently dangerous nature of the steel fabrication industry.
Eight safety honor awards from the American Institute of Steel Construction, recognizing their outstanding safety program. They received their most recent award in 2018.
Six consecutive ‘Circle-of-Safety Awards’ from Pinnacol Assurance, their worker’s compensation insurance carrier, the largest provider in the state of Colorado. Pikes Peak Steel earned their most
recent award in 2018. With more than 57,000 worker’s compensation customers, Pinnacol recognizes less than one-tenth of one percent of its clients with their ‘Circle-of-Safety Award.’
Pikes Peak Steel saw immediate benefits from their new safety policies and programs. For example, earning the American Institute of Steel Construction certification allowed the company to compete for larger projects statewide. Dedication to workplace safety and quality fabrication lowered their facility error rate to 0.035 percent while simultaneously keeping injury rates low, a real hallmark of a well-run company.
Carter continues to emphasize both the safety program and the quality program. The company has experienced an ongoing transformation in BOTH safety and quality and focuses on these two goals (safety and quality) as a single unit. From his point of view, safety and quality are indistinguishable functions of personnel and leadership. They are goals and measurements of performance by the company’s personnel. Pikes Peak Steel has acknowledged this fact with their motto, “Safety is a requirement and quality is a goal.”
On-Site Consultation and SHARP are voluntary programs. To locate the OSHA On-Site Consultation Program nearest you, call 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) or visit www.osha.gov/consultation.
Source: Glen Carter, Owner, Pikes Peak Steel, LLC
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety & Health Administration
200 Constitution Ave NW
Washington, DC 20210
800-321-6742 (OSHA)
TTY
www.OSHA.gov
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
White House
Severe Storm and Flood Recovery
Assistance
Diaster Recovery Assistance
DisasterAssistance.gov
USA.gov
No Fear Act Data
U.S. Office of Special Counsel
OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY & HEALTH
Frequently Asked
Questions
A – Z Index
Freedom of
Information Act –
OSHA
Read The OSHA
Newsletter
Subscribe to the
OSHA Newsletter
OSHA Publications
Office of Inspector
General
ABOUT THIS SITE
Freedom of Information Act – DOL
Privacy & Security Statement
Disclaimers
Important Web Site Notices
Plug-ins Used by DOL
Accessibility Statement
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!