Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Discussion Question (DQ7)
7-1. Describe what needs to be done to manage risk on a project. When should this be done? How can a risk assessment matrix help in this process?
7-2. How does project risk change as a project progresses? What changes are made to the risk assessment matrix as the changes occur?
12-7 Why are problem-solving meetings conducted? Who should call such meetings? Describe the approach that should be followed
After posting your response to the questions above, please respond to at least two other postings of your classmates (Develop your response in nor less than 5 lines)******************************
classmate 1 (Lixan)
7.1 To manage risk in any project you should identify, asses, control and respond to the possible risks in a project. These need to be done on a regular basis to minimize the possibility of risk. A risk assessment matrix is something that helps this process by assessing the project risks on the base of many factors such as costs, time and environmental factors. Lastly, it helps assess the chance of success of the project.
7.2 Even in the best planned out projects there will always be unexpected changes and uncertainties. Problems like budget cut, or even unexpected fire can affect the project. Another issue can be a staff member quitting or passing on. The changes that can be made to the risk assessment matrix are firstly to identify the risks of a project. Secondly, to take advice from all staff members in analysis as different people have different skills and expertise. Lastly, it is imperative to retain and take care of staff from starting to the end of the project.
12.7 Problem-solving meetings are conducted to solve either a specific or general problem. These meetings are the most important and complex meetings in an organization. The personal who should conduct such meeting are the leaders of the company. For example, owner, C.E.O, and top managers. The approach that should be followed is direct and problem-solving mindset. The end goal of the meeting is to have a successful solution and execution for the problem at hand.
**********************
classmate 2 (Samuel)
7-1 Risk management involves identification, assessment, control, and response to project risks to minimize the likelihood of occurrence and/or potential impact of adverse events on the accomplishment of the project objective. A tool for assessing and managing risks is a risk assessment matrix, also referred to as a risk register, which includes potential risks, their potential impact, likelihood of occurrence, and response plan. Managing risk includes taking action to prevent or minimize the likelihood of occurrence or the impact of such unfavorable events. Some level of risk planning should be done during the initiating phase of the project life cycle
7-2 As the project progresses, some risks at the start of the project may no longer be a factor and other risks crop up that need addressed. The risk assessment matrix is updated in response to changes in order to accurately reflect the likelihood of occurrence, the degree of impact, the action trigger, the responsibility and the response plan.
12-7 Problem solving meetings are conducted so the problems can be identified positively. They also are held to find the best solution possible. The people that should conduct these meetings should be top level leaders and management. The approach that should be followed is to find the problem and try to come up with a solution that will be the most beneficial to the project.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!