Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Week 2: Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process
Purpose
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue work on a previously identified area or phenomenon of interest related to their MSN specialty track. Week Two’s assignment builds upon the identified area of interest by developing an overview of the evidence-based practice (EBP) project and the PCIOT/PICo question. This assignment initiates the evidence-based practice proposal that is continued throughout the entire course with each assignment adding components of the research process.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:CO#1 Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. PO 1CO#2 Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes. PO 2, 5CO#4 Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. PO 1, 2, 3, 5Due Date: Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week TwoTotal Points Possible: 150 points
Requirements
Description of the AssignmentThis assignment builds on the identification of a nursing concern from NR 500 and the application of a nursing theory to the selected concern from NR 501. For this course, the selected concern and nursing theory then serve as a foundation to the identification of PICOT/PICo. Identification of the literature search strategy is also required. Criteria for Content
- Overview of Selected Evidenced-based Practice Project: This section provides a foundation to the MSN EBP scholarly project. It should contain the following elements:
- Explain the relationship between research and evidenced-based practice (EBP)
- Distinguish how EBP is different from research
- Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing
- Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus
- Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting
- Identification of the Nursing Concern to be Improved: This section provides a comprehensive discussion of the selected nursing concern. It should contain the following elements:
- Explain the selected nursing concern in detail
- Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting
- Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern
- Identify the consequences of the selected concern
- Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern
- Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal
- PICOT/PICo question and Literature Search Process: This section identifies the PICOT/PICo question that will used for this EBP proposal. The literature search parameters will also be identified. It should contain the following elements:
- Identify the question in correct format with all required elements
- PICOT for quantitative research approach
- PICo for qualitative research approach
- Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting
- Discuss the purpose of conducting a literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal
- Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:
- The specific library databases used
- The key search terms and phrases used
- The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used
- Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal
- Theoretical Framework: This section presents the theoretical framework that will used in this EBP project. It should contain the following section:
- Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal
- Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applied to this EBP proposal
Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
- The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 5, but no more than 8 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
- Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
- A minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research-based scholarly references must be used. Required textbook for this course, dictionary and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to submission of the assignment.
- Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
- Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
Directions and Assignment Criteria
Assignment Criteria Points % Description Overview of Selected Evidenced-based Practice Project 25 17 Required content for this section includes:· Explain the relationship between research and evidenced-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting Identification of the Nursing Concern to be Improved 25 17 Required content for this section includes:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal PICOT/PICo question and Literature Search Process 20 13 The required content for this section includes:Identify the question in correct format with all required elements:· PICOT for quantitative research approach· PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting a literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposalo Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:o The specific library databases usedo The key search terms and phrases usedo The minor (additional) search terms and phrases usedo Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal Theoretical Framework 20 16 The required content for this section includes:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applied to this EBP proposal Paper Specifications 10 8 Paper meets length requirements of 5 to 8 pages.Minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research scholarly nursing referencesA dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment.References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to assignment submission. APA Format (6th edition) 25 17 Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.One deduction for each type of APA style error Citations in Text 10 7 Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly. Writing Mechanics 15 10 Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. Total 150 100 % Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performance ContentPossible Points = 100 Points Overview of Selected Evidenced-based Practice Project 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: · Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:· Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: · Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:· Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements:· Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting Identification of the Nursing Concern to be Improved 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: · Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal Presentation of information in one, two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal PICOT/PICo question and Literature Search Process 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 Points Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:· Identify the question in correct format with all required elementso PICOT for quantitative research approacho PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:o The specific library databases usedo The key search terms and phrases usedo The minor (additional) search terms and phrases usedo Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:· Identify the question in correct format with all required elementso PICOT for quantitative research approacho PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:o The specific library databases usedo The key search terms and phrases usedo The minor (additional) search terms and phrases usedo Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: · Identify the question in correct format with all required elementso PICOT for quantitative research approacho PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcomewill be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:o The specific library databases usedo The key search terms and phrases usedo The minor (additional) search terms and phrases usedo Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:· Identify the question in correct format with all required elementso PICOT for quantitative research approacho PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:o The specific library databases usedo The key search terms and phrases usedo The minor (additional) search terms and phrases usedo Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements:· Identify the question in correct format with all required elementso PICOT for quantitative research approacho PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:o The specific library databases usedo The key search terms and phrases usedo The minor (additional) search terms and phrases usedo Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal Theoretical Framework 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 Points Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: · Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal
Paper Specifications 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points This section included all of the following: · Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. This section included three of the following:· Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. This section included only two of the following:· Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. This section included only one of the following: · Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. This section included none of the following:· Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. Content Subtotal ________of 100 points FormatPossible Points = 50 Points APA Style 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,· body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), andreference page One deduction for each type of APA format error0 to 1 APA error was present
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,· body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), andreference page One deduction for each type of APA format error2 – 3 APA errors were present
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,· body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), andreference page One deduction for each type of APA format error4 – 5 APA errors were are present
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,· body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), andreference page One deduction for each type of APA format error6 – 7 APA errors were present
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error8 or greater APA errors were present
Citations 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Writing Mechanics 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points 1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
Format Subtotal _____of 50 points Total Points _____of 150 points
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!