Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW. CONTACT ME ***
Purpose of Paper III: Study Two
1). Psychological Purpose
Paper III is intended to extend your original study by looking at a second independent
variable. It is intended to help you take your original study one step further by letting you
predict how a second independent variable of your lab’s choosing impacts participants. In
this replication with extension study, you have a greater role in a). choosing which articles
to include in your follow-up literature review as well as b). identifying how this new
variable influences your hypotheses. You will make all of the suggested edits we made in
Paper I, plus include 2 new paragraphs thoroughly reviewing 2 articles supporting the
inclusion of the second variable into our analysis. It should not only seamlessly relate with
our original independent variable, but it should also reliably predict the outcome.
In other words, Paper III includes:
1). Your original Paper I with all the edits suggested
2). A very brief second literature review (at least two paragraphs, no more than
three) that focuses on your second independent variable and follows the literature
review in your Paper I. This will require 2-3 new citations/references related to the
new independent variable.
3). An updated references page with a minimum of 2 NEW references
Paper III builds on and extends Study One’s focus, using two levels of your original
independent variable and similar dependent variables but altering or extending them into a
new study design. You should make an explicit effort to tie in your previous 5 references
with your new ones, to make one cohesive literature review. The two new paragraphs you
will write concern a second independent variable that you and your lab will manipulate
during the second part of the semester. You will need to find at least 2 new references for
this second independent variable, hopefully finding sources that build a bridge between
studies one and two. In other words, in Paper III you will answer the following question:
“How will the presence of a second independent variable impact participant decisions?”
Like Paper I, your literature review should end by noting your specific hypotheses. Here,
you will keep the old hypotheses AND include the new ones, addressing both main effects
(outcomes associated with each independent variable alone) and interactions (the
combined impact of your independent variables).
2). APA Formatting Purpose
The second purpose of Paper III: Literature Review is to once again teach you proper
American Psychological Association (APA) formatting. In the pages below, I will tell you
how to format your paper using APA style. There are a lot of very specific requirements in
APA papers, so pay attention to the instructions below as well as Chapter 14 in your book!
3). Writing Purpose
PAPER III: LITERATURE REVIEW 3
Finally, this paper is intended to help you refine your writing. We expect you
implemented feedback from Paper I to improve your grammar, spelling, and content. This
paper is terminal in nature, like a final exam, and thus the feedback you receive will be
limited to the rubric. So, do your best. All paper assignments in this course can be
combined into one long research paper and submitted as a writing sample for graduate
programs or jobs, so make sure you write clearly and precisely for an educated reader.
PAPER III: LITERATURE REVIEW 4
Instructions for Paper III: Study Two (Worth 65 Points)
The good news is that we are continuing with our topic of Study One. You wrote a lot on that
already, so here you simply add to it, noting how a second independent variable might interact
with the original manipulation from Study One. Here are the components to keep in mind. By
now, a lot of this should be familiar to you, so you’ll see a lot of overlap with the instructions and
checklists from Paper I and Paper II.
1. Title Page: I expect the following format:
a. This title page is a lot like the title page on your Papers I and II. See my “Title”
page above as an example or reuse your title page from prior papers (though you
may need to modify your title given your new IVs in this study).
b. You must have a header and page numbers on each page.
i. If you don’t know how to insert headers, watch this very helpful video!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pbUoNa5tyY.
ii. The header goes at the top of the paper and it is left justified.
1. Use “Insert Headers” or click on the top of the page to open the
header. Make sure to select the “Different first page” option so that
your title page header will differ from subsequent pages
2. The R in Running head is capitalized but the h is lower case,
followed by a colon and a short title (in ALL CAPS). This short
running head title can be the same one as the rest of your paper or it
can differ – the choice is yours, but it should be no more than 50
characters including spaces and punctuation
3. Insert a page number as well. While the header is flush left, the
page number is flush right.
iii. Want an example header? Look at the title page of these instructions! You
can use other titles depending on your own.
c. Your Title should be midway up the page, with your name (First Last) and the
name of your institution beneath the title. For this class, only your own name
will go on this paper. Double space everything!
i. You can also refer to Chapter 14 in your textbook
2. Abstract?
a. You DO NOT need an abstract for Paper III
3. Literature Review Study Two
a. APA formatting
i. Your study two literature review will follow the last body paragraph from
Paper I. Your goal is to have one long literature review. There is no page
break, so have it come right after Paper I literature review, but before the
hypotheses.
b. APA formatted citations for the literature review
i. You have to have at least 7 references total in your literature review. I
require 2 new references for Paper III. These two sources have to be
PAPER III: LITERATURE REVIEW 5
empirical peer-reviewed articles (that is, each of these cited articles should
have a literature review, a methods section, a results section, a
conclusion/discussion, and references). Note: Internet blogs and Wikipedia
are not acceptable, even as secondary sources. Here is a bit more to note:
1. I am not setting a maximum on the number of citations you can use,
but between studies one and two you need at minimum 7
references. These may overlap among students, so it is okay to read
the same articles as some of your classmates. In fact, I encourage
study sessions in which you review articles as a group, just be
mindful you each write your own paragraphs (if I see too much
overlap across classmates, I will give you a 0 on the paper). You
cannot use any of the articles posted on Canvas for your new
references.
a. Referring to your first study does not count as a reference.
2. Proper citations must be made in the paper – give credit where it is
due, and don’t make claims that cannot be validated! If it sounds
like a fact, then you must provide a citation to support that fact.
3. DO NOT plagiarize. You will turn this in on Canvas, and we can
check for plagiarism via turn-it-in. Paraphrasing is okay, but you
must still cite the original author even if you do not use his or her
words verbatim. If you rewrite what they say, it is still them that
had the original idea, and they deserve credit for it.
4. If you directly quote a source, make sure to provide a page number
for where you found that quote. However, I prefer paraphrasing to
direct quotes. I allow three quotes total for the whole paper
(including the two that I allowed in Paper I). If you quote more
than three times you will lose one point for each additional
quote.
c. Content-based requirements for your study two literature review
i. Think about your study two literature review this way: You are writing an
extension to study one, so your new story picks up where that story left off.
a. I want you to pay close attention to your review from Study
One. You drew some conclusions there, but now is your
chance to build on those conclusions, and maybe add to
them based on the Paper II findings. At the beginning of
your new Study Two story, your audience knows some of
the story from Study One, so there is no need to rewrite
what you already presented (except for the edits we
suggested, of course). Rather, you need to set the stage for
the new sequel storyline. Introduce your new “character”, or
your new independent variable. Talk about this somewhat in
isolation (what does research say about this variable on its
PAPER III: LITERATURE REVIEW 6
own). Once you define and clarify what this new variable is
and how it has been used in prior research, start to show
how it connects to your own study one.
2. At the end of the story, start to lead the reader to the big cliffhanger
(your hypotheses). By now you have introduced the characters as
well as the plot, but then you want to build some anticipation in
your reader – you want them to wonder what comes next! That is,
“Given what we saw in the literature, what happens if we do XYZ?”
Thus you build your review to lead to your hypotheses.
d. The literature review for study two must have a minimum of 2 new references.
4. References: I expect the following format
a. The References section starts on its own page, with the word References centered.
Use proper APA format in this section or you will lose points.
b. You need at least 2 new references that you cited in the study two literature
review, but I expect including those plus the five from Paper I (that is, 7 total).
c. For references, make sure you:
i. use alphabetical ordering (start with the last name of the first author)
ii. use the authors’ last names but only the initials of their first/middle name
iii. give the date in parentheses – e.g. (2007).
iv. italicize the name of the journal article
v. give the volume number, also in italics
vi. give the page numbers (not italicized) for articles
vii. provide the doi (digital object identifier) if present (not italicized)
5. Overall writing quality
a. Make sure you check your paper for proper spelling and grammar. If we told you
to visit the Writing Center or the Center for Academic Success as part of your
Paper I feedback, we expect you to have done so, and for the quality of your
writing to have improved.
Other Guidelines for Paper III: Study Two
§ 1). Page size is 8 1/2 X 11” with all 4 margins set at 1”. You must use a 12-point font with
Times New Roman font. EVERYTHING in the paper (including references) is double
spaced
§ 2). When summarizing articles for your lit review and doing so in your own words, make
sure you still cite the original source. Always use proper referencing procedures, which
means that:
o If you are inserting a direct quote from any source, it must be enclosed in
quotations and followed by a parenthetical reference to the source. “Let’s say I am
directly quoting this current sentence and the next. I would then cite it with the
author name, date of publication, and the page number for the direct quote”
(Winter, 2013, p. 5).
1. Note: We will deduct points if you quote more than three times in the
paper, so keep quotes to a minimum. Paraphrase instead, but make sure
you still give the original author credit for the material by citing it or using
the author’s name (“In this article, Smith noted that …” or “In this article,
the authors noted that…”)
PAPER III: LITERATURE REVIEW 7
§ 3). PLEASE use a spell checker to avoid unnecessary errors. Proofread everything you
write. I actually recommend reading some sentences aloud to see if they flow well, or
getting family or friends to read your work. Using Pearson Writer is also required
The above information is required for your paper, but I wanted to provide a few tips about writing
your study two literature review as well. Hopefully this will give you some good directions:
• First, most other sections of this PSY3215 require a full brand-new literature review for
Paper III (5 new references and an entirely new intro and conclusion). We do not because
we expect you to make all of the edits we suggested in Paper I. You have plenty of time to
make all of these changes, so we will be very strict during grading. This is designed to
allow you to grow and evolve as a writer and a researcher. We spend a lot of time giving
you quality feedback so if you do not pay attention to it, your grade will be low.
• Second, like Paper I, Paper III is all about supporting your Study Two hypotheses. You
are expected to write your own hypotheses this time around, so make sure you have
thought them through before you write the paper.
• Third, make sure to proofread, proofread, proofread! Use the Pearson Writer, Writing
Center, and Center for Academic Success for help, but note that their suggestions are just
that – suggestions. It is up to you to make sure the flow of the paper is easy to understand.
Good luck!Running head: PAPER III: STUDY TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 1
Checklist – Paper III: Study Two Literature Review
Use the check sheet below to make sure your paper is the best it can be! Make sure you answer
“Yes” to all questions before submitting your paper! Some sections duplicate checklists from
prior papers while those in purple focus on new Study Two Literature Review elements.
General Paper Format (This section is identical to the Papers I and II Checklists)
Yes No
1. Is everything in your paper (including headers, the main body of your miniliterature
review, and your references) in 12 point Times New Roman font?
2. Is everything in your paper double spaced, including references (here I mean
the spacing above and below each line, not the spaces following a period)?
3. Do you have one inch margins on all sides of the paper (one inch from the top
of the page, one inch from the bottom, and one inch from each side)
4. Are the first lines of all paragraphs indented roughly ? inch?
5. Are your paragraphs aligned left? (That is, text should be flush left, with lines
lining up on the left of the page, but text should NOT line up on the right side
of the page – it should look ragged)
Title page (This section is identical to the Papers I and II Checklists)
Yes No Header
1. Do you have the phrase “Running head” in your header (with a lower case h)?
2. Is the rest of your Running head title in ALL CAPS?
3. Is your Running head in 12 point Times New Roman font?
4. Do you have a page number (1) that is flush right (also in 12 point Times New
Roman font)?
5. Is your header 50 characters or less (including spaces and punctuation)?
Title / Name / Institution
1. Is your title 12 words or less (as recommended by the APA)?
2. Does your title describe your general paper theme (while avoiding something
blank like “Paper Three: Literature Review”)? Note that your header and title
can differ!
3. Do all title words with four letters or more start with a capital letter?
4. Are your name and institution correct?
5. Are your title, name, and institution elements centered and in 12 point Times
New Roman font?
Literature Review (This section is nearly identical to Paper I)
Yes No Title for the literature review
1. Do you have the identical title you used on the title page rewritten at the top
of your literature review?
2. Is this title centered?
3. Does your literature review start on page 2?
Main body of the literature review
1. Does your literature review start broadly, giving a brief overview of the
study?
PAPER III: LITERATURE REVIEW 2
2. Do you seamlessly include your 2 new paragraphs, reviewing literature for the
second IV, right after the literature review from Paper I but before the
hypotheses?
3. Does your literature review narrow down toward your hypotheses?
4. Do your paragraphs transition from one to the next? (That is, avoid simply
listing studies you read. Tie them together. How does Study A in paragraph A
relate to Study B in paragraph B?)
5. Does your paper end in your very specific hypotheses? (You will lose points
if your paper doesn’t provide the specific predictions!)
6. Did you make sure your predictions are written in the past tense?
Citations for the literature review
1. Did you cite a minimum total of 7 references (2 brand new ones). Are they all
peer-reviewed empirical sources?
2. Are your citations in APA format (That is, ONLY the last name of the
author(s) and date of publication)?
a. Note that you do NOT include first names, initials, or the title of the article
the authors wrote when citing. That information belongs in the references
pages only.
b. Also note that you only use an ampersand – the & symbol – when it occurs
within parentheses. In other instances, use the word “and”
3. Are all of the sources in the References page included in your review?
4. If you quoted, did you provide a page number for the direct quote?
5. If you paraphrased in any way, did you cite the source of that information?
5. Did you cite everything that sounded like it was factual information?
6. Did you make sure the period follows the citation rather than coming before it?
References Page (This section is similar to Paper I, but with 7 references)
Yes No Title for the references page
1. Do references start on their own page?
2. Is the word “References” centered?
References – Make sure these are in APA format!
1. Are references listed in alphabetical order (starting with the last name of the
first author listed) for all 7 articles you referenced?
2. Are all citations from the literature review referenced?
3. Is the first line of the reference flush left while subsequent lines are indented
(Note: Use the ruler function for this. DO NOT simply tab)?
4. Did you use the “&” symbol when listing more than one author name?
5. Did you include the date of publication
6. For article references, is the article title (which is not italicized) with only the
first word and proper names starting with a capital letter?
7. For article references, is the name of the journal present with all major words
starting with a capital letter (and this journal title is italicized)?
8. For article references, is the volume number italicized
9. For article references, are the page numbers present (not italicized)
10. For article references, is the DOI present
Writing Quality
Yes No 1. Did you make ALL of the edits suggested in Paper I?
PAPER III: LITERATURE REVIEW 3
2. Did you proofread your paper, go to the writing center, go to the research
methods help center, or use the Pearson writer to make sure your paper flows
well?
2. Did you use the past tense (which is recommended, since your papers in this
class will reflect work you already did rather than work you will do)?
3. Did you use a scientific / objective terms like “people”, “participants”. “users”,
“readers”, etc. (as opposed to subjective words like “you”, “we”, “me”, “I”, or
“us”, etc.)?FEEDBACK GUIDELINES FOR PAPER III (65 points total)
Standards achieved
Met standards Met most
standards
Did not meet most
standards
Did not meet
standards
1. Writing:
Intro
exceptional introduction
that grabs interest of
reader and clearly
states topic.
introduction is
exceptionally clear, and
well-developed.
proficient
introduction that is
interesting and states
topic.
introduction is clear
& mostly developed.
basic introduction
that states topic but
lacks interest.
introduction is
somewhat clear and
arguable.
weak or no
introduction of
topic. introduction is
confusing.
paper’s purpose is
unclear.
2. Writing:
Conclusion
excellent summary of
argument that leads
into Paper IV.
introduces no new
information. includes
hypothesis.
good summary of
topic with clear
concluding ideas
leading into Paper IV.
introduces no new
information.
hypothesis not
included.
basic summary of
topic with some final
concluding ideas.
Does not lead into
Paper IV.
introduces no new
information.
hypothesis not
included.
lack of summary of
topic or nonexistent.
Does not
lead into Paper IV.
hypothesis not
included.
3. Writing:
General
writing is clear, with no
grammatical,
syntactical, and/or
spelling errors –
polished and
professional.
writing is mostly
clear, with only minor
grammatical,
syntactical, and/or
spelling errors.
many fundamental
grammatical,
syntactical, and
spellings errors
throughout the
paper. and/or
plagiarism/overlap is
high.
the paper is very
challenging to read
due to poor writing
flow, grammatical,
syntactical, and
spelling errors.
paper is off-topic.
and/or
plagiarism/overlap
is unacceptably
high.
4. Article
Summaries
the articles are expertly
summarized and give
reader enough
information to be able
to understand the
studies.
the articles are
mostly wellsummarized,
giving
most of the
information
necessary for the
reader to understand.
the articles are
summarized but do
not provide enough
information for the
reader to
understand.
the articles are not
summarized
correctly. it is clear
the student did not
follow the format in
the Example Paper.
5. Content
application
– Support of
Hypothesis
and
Analysis
exceptionally critical,
relevant and consistent
connections made
between articles and
hypothesis.
excellent analysis.
articles not provided in
Canvas, as
summarized, are
relevant to the topic
and support the
hypothesis.
consistent
connections made
between articles and
hypothesis.
good analysis.
articles not provided
in Canvas, as
summarized, are
relevant to the topic
and support the
hypothesis.
some connections
made between
articles and
hypothesis.
some analysis.
articles not provided
in Canvas, as
summarized, are not
relevant to the topic
and/or do not
support the
hypothesis.
limited or no
connections made
between articles
and hypothesis.
lack of analysis.
articles not provided
in Canvas, as
summarized, are
not relevant to the
topic and do not
support the
hypothesis.
Met standards Met most
standards
Did not meet most
standards
Did not meet
standards
6. APA:
General
Paper
Format
paper (including
headers, the main
body, and references)
is in 12-point Times
New Roman font,
double spaced, with 1”
margins, paragraphs
?”, and aligned left.
formatting is very
good, but has some
minor mistakes in
the font type or size,
spacing, margin size,
or alignment.
formatting has many
errors in font type
and/or size, spacing,
margin size, and/or
alignment.
formatting is
consistently
incorrect in many
respects including
errors in font type
and/or size,
spacing, margin
size, and/or
alignment.
7. APA: Title
Page
running head is in
header, with lower case
‘h’, in all caps, & page
number flush right. title
is 12 words or fewer,
centered, and words
with four or more
letters start with a
capital letter.
the title page has
some minor
mistakes in the
header or title, as
noted in the first
column, but is
generally correct.
the title page has
many fundamental
errors in formatting of
the header and/or
title, as noted in the
first column.
title page
consistently does
not follow the
formatting
instructions
provided.
8. APA: First
Page
header title present,
identical to header on
title page, all caps,
omits phrase
‘RUNNING HEAD’. page
number is in header,
flush right. title is
identical to title page
and centered.
some minor errors
are made in header
title, or page
number, or paper
title, as outlined in
the first column.
many errors are made
in header title, and/or
page number, and/or
paper title, as outlined
in the first column.
the APA formatting
as outlined in the
first column is
consistently
lacking in several
areas.
9. APA:
References
Page
start on their own page.
title is centered. all
citations are
referenced. APA
formatting of
references is perfect.
start on their own
page. title is
centered. all
citations are
referenced. APA
formatting of
references is mostly
correct, though there
are some minor
errors such as
sources not listed in
alphabetical order.
do not start on their
own page and/or title
is not centered and/or
all citations are not
referenced. APA
formatting of
references has many
fundamental
mistakes, including
sources not listed in
alphabetical order.
generally
disregards the
instructions
provided in
formatting the
references page,
either in formatting
or inclusion of all
cited material.
10. Citations
paper includes at least 7
citations. in-text citations
are correctly formatted.
quotes and paraphrased
text are correctly cited.
paper includes at
least 6 citations.
There are some minor
errors in the in-text
citations, quotes or
paraphrased text.
paper includes 5
citations. There are
some major errors in
the in-text citations,
quotes and/or
paraphrased text.
formatting of
citations is
generally incorrect
and does not follow
guidelines provided.
There are fewer
than 5 citations
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!