potential challenges for engagement assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Post a blog post that includes:
- An explanation of potential challenges for engagement in your field education experience (* A substance abuse and mental health clinic* Redeem Healthcare Medical Systems in Baltimore)
- An explanation of personal action plans you might take to address engagement in your field education experience
BY DAY 4
Respond to the blog post of three colleagues in one or more of the following ways:
- Make a suggestion to your colleague’s post.
- Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
- Colleague 1: Amber M
- An explanation of potential challenges for engagement in your field education experienceAt my field placement I work with a lot clients who are mentally ill or suffer from substance abuse; a challenge with engagement is that sometimes the clients are too psychotic or detoxing too hard to understand or function. In stances like these it can be difficult. In other cases some patients feel the stigma of substance abuse or mental illness and feel like I can do nothing for them. Most of the patients that are at the hospital are involuntarily committed and are not always cooperative. An explanation of personal action plans you might take to address engagement in your field education experience.By expressing empathy and using my soft skills such as my tone of voice I can not only have engagement with my patients but positive engagement. According to Gerdes and Segal, “Research demonstrates that empathy is an important tool for positive therapeutic intervention” (2011). Empathy conveys an understanding and emotional intelligence. The populations I work with are often misunderstood and judged empathy can help me engage and help them meet their goals.Gerdes, K. E., & Segal, E. (2011). Importance of empathy for social work practice: Integrating new science. Social Work, 56(2), 141-8. Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?qurl=https%3A…
Colleague 2: Ryan The challenges that I see me having for engagement with clients during this field experience is that I am still working in the same office with my supervisor, so the clients that I have are all going to be her clients. I am in charge of teaching the 4-6 year old Social Skills group, and engagement with them is difficult because they all have ADHD or ODD, so they are not really “excited” about sitting still and trying to learn. The other clients that I work with on a daily basis with her are all used to her being the therapist and some are not so keen on having a “student” be there, as if they are a science project.While I do not engage in the therapy with her individual clients, it is now my responsibility to execute the actions needed to provide them support. If for instance, a woman is having issues with an abusive husband, it is my job to reach out to the women’s shelter and work with them to provider her safety. If a couple are being seen for their anxiety due to finances, I am the one that my supervisor tasks with finding them ways to provide for needs that would contribute to the betterment of their living conditions. Whether it is finding a home for a beloved pet that the upkeep is eating into the budget too much, or if I need to work with the local community college to try to secure the husband a place in an upcoming class to learn a skill to get a better job.Ways that I see me overcoming this challenge is to just be there and be the support that she needs me to be. The clients will eventually see that I am a part of THEIR team. I am only helping to better their life. By maintaining the professional attitude that i have always had, I will eventually win them over, and build the rapport that she has with these clients. Even though, there are already some of her clients that liked me from my first field experience and are willing to get me to help them with their needs.Colleague 3: Ashlynn
An explanation of potential challenges for engagement in your field education experienceIn my field experience working with Children’s Protective Service and foster care youth, I may face many challenges for engagement.One particular challenge is building rapport with families. As a CPS Specialist, parents can be very hesitant with a worker knocking on their door identifying themselves as a CPS worker. With CPS and foster care there is a lot of stigma. With this some families may feel fear and shame, and not allow the Specialist to fully help and assist the family with their needs.
With this being the second quarter, I learned some great skills in my field experience. One skill learned was simply just engaging with my field supervisor so that we can both have a better experience. On my list of action plan is great communication. I make eye contact, ask clarifying questions when I’m unsure or do not understand and actively listen. In CPS, when talking to clients in regards to any allegations the department received, I ensure to let the family know they are just allegations. I use clear communication to let the parents know exactly why I am present. While working with foster care youth, I plan on finding a common interest to discuss to build rapport.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!