Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
OTA 2270 Midterm Exam Essay
Order ID 53563633773
Type Essay
Writer Level Masters
Style APA
Sources/References 4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Instructions
This exam is open from noon on Friday through noon on Sunday; you must take the exam within this time. You will be given one attempt to take your exam. Make sure to use a stable internet connection.
All exams are to be taken individually; it is a violation of academic integrity if exams are taken collaboratively.
This exam contains 40 multiple choice questions.Exam policy as stated in syllabus:
Missed exams/quizzes due to errors in scheduling, misunderstandings with set times of exams/quizzes (confusion over time zones) or technological errors do not warrant re-opening/re-scheduling of exams/quizzes. The faculty committee will determine whether a change in the exam period is warranted, which does not include vacations, business trips, or family events, etc. If an emergency situation arises requiring a student to miss an exam, the course instructor should be notified immediately and documentation for the situation is required with notification. If an emergency occurs and the student misses the exam within the exam period, the faculty committee may approve an alternative time for completing the exam with a 10% grade deduction per day. An emergency is just that – an emergency (severe illness requiring hospitalization, accident, death, etc.). There will be no make-up quizzes.
OTA STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
Leadership and Collaboration: To prepare practitioners who have the skills to lead and influence occupational therapy practice, as well as the skills to collaborate with and follow the lead of others
Ethics and Social Justice: To prepare practitioners to demonstrate ethical decision making grounded in principles of social justice
Diversity and Global Perspective: To prepare advanced practitioners with skills to work effectively in cross cultural settings with diverse clientele
Critical and Creative Inquiry: To prepare practitioners to apply evidence to support best occupational therapy practice by demonstrating critical analysis and reasoning skills in current and evolving practice for OTAs
Effective Communication: To develop practitioners who have proficiency in written and oral communication skills
Discipline-Based Competence: Occupational Therapy Assistant: To prepare practitioners who have an understanding of human occupation, OT theories, frames of reference and core concepts, health-pathology continuum related to participation, current and emerging OT service delivery models, and
To prepare practitioners who collaborate with the occupational therapist to demonstrate an understanding of and skills related to OT process (evaluation and assessment, intervention planning and intervention, and discontinuation of services)
Purposeful Life-long Learning: To prepare practitioners to have a philosophy and practice of lifelong learningCOURSE OBJECTIVES:
Course objectives (ACOTE standard)
Upon successful completion of this course, you will:
Instructional Strategy
Teaching strategies and tactics used to facilitate learning
Method of Assessment
Outcome measurement tool
Effectively interact through written, oral, and nonverbal communication with the client, family, significant others, colleagues, other health providers, and the public in a professionally acceptable manner. B.5.20
Discussion, cooperative learning, simulation, Level I Fieldwork Experience
Level I Fieldwork Performance Evaluation completed by the Fieldwork Educator, MICA Assignment and Discussion
Use sound judgment in regard to safety of self and others and adhere to safety regulations throughout the occupational therapy process as appropriate to the setting and scope of practice. C. Level I Fieldwork Experience Level I Fieldwork Performance Evaluation completed by the Fieldwork Educator
Demonstrate therapeutic use of self, including one’s personality, insights, perceptions, and judgments, as part of the therapeutic process in both individual and group interaction. B.5.7 Level I Fieldwork Experience, Readings, Discussions and Reflections Level I Fieldwork Performance Evaluation completed by the Fieldwork Educator
Articulate to clients, other health professionals, and individuals in the community the unique nature of occupation as viewed by the occupational therapy profession and the value of occupation in supporting performance, health, well-being, and participation. B.2.3 Level I Fieldwork Experience, Readings, Discussions and Reflections Level I Fieldwork Performance Evaluation completed by the Fieldwork Educator
Provide therapeutic use of occupation, exercises, and activities (e.g., occupation-based intervention, purposeful activity, preparatory methods). B.5.3 Level I FW Experience Level I Fieldwork Performance Evaluation completed by the Fieldwork Educator
Abide by HIPAA Regulations Level I Fieldwork Experience Level I Fieldwork Performance Evaluation completed by the Fieldwork Educator and Module Quizzes
Demonstrate knowledge of psychological and social factors that influence engagement in occupation Discussions, MICA and reflection Level I Fieldwork Performance Evaluation completed by the Fieldwork Educator, MICA Assignment and Discussion
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!