Operations Management Assessment Analytical Report
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Operations Management Assessment
Your major assessment on the Operations Management module takes the form of an analytical report to investigate the ‘Operations Strategy’ of McDonald’s in a global business environment and the major operations practice they have adopted. The analytical report should be completed and submitted as an INDIVIDUAL piece of work. This assignment accounts for 90% of the total weighting of the module.
Word limit: 4000 ± 10% (ca 1000 per question)
REPORT BRIEF
Read the McDonald’s case study Slack et al. (2019; pp. 103-106). Your task is
to write an analytical report to focus on the ‘Operations Strategy’ of
McDonald’s in a global business environment and the major operations
practice they have adopted. You are specifically tasked to:
- Critically reflect on how operations contribute to McDonald’s organisational performance. In your response, consider which processes are in place to assume the company’s competitive advantage.
- Assess McDonald’s operations strategy (i.e. ‘lean thinking’, ‘quality’, TQM) and implications for setting up processes and/or supply chains?
- Evaluate the statement “Honesty and transparency make you vulnerable. Be honest and transparent anyway” from the perspective of McDonald’s operations function. Consider in your response, the transparency, traceability and vulnerability of operations.
- Based on your analysis, list some recommendations to McDonald’s to remain competitive in a turbulent and global business environment. Consider new trends like veganism and more environmentally conscious customer in your response.
Note: Your recommendations should be listed, following your conclusion and clearly relate to your analysis in the main body (to questions 1 – 3).
This report should be underpinned by theoretical principles and concepts that you have learnt on the Operations Management module. Please ensure that your report includes an Executive Summary and follows the principles of academic writing in an analytical report writing style. You must present your in-text citations and reference list following the APA 6th referencing system. Ensure your word processing dictionary is set to British English.
Note: You need to write analytical report. This will have a significant impact on your response, style and tone of your report writing style. In an analytical report – context and some necessary background are important, this is similar to an ‘Introduction’ but avoid using this heading. In a report the introduction is usually termed the ‘Terms of Reference’ OR ‘Scope of the Report’.
Topics
- Introduction to Operations Management
- The Strategic Role and Objectives of Operations
- Lean thinking
- Inventory and Just-in-time Management
- Process, Product and Service Design
- Layout and Flow
- Supply Chain Management and Network Design
- Sustainable and Green Operations
- Quality Management
- Performance Measurement and Improvement
Advice
Main focus of the report should be on the theoretical principles and concepts
of Operations Management module. This includes ‘lean thinking’, ‘quality leadership’, just-in-time concepts and issues around ‘green operations’ – major units and themes throughout the entire module. The information for question 1 can be extracted from the case study and the company’s website. You are also welcomed to use academic articles and reports on MacDonald’s as well. Questions 2 and 3 require you to do further research, using the unit guides as a starting point, and for higher awards (grade bands above 65% will require you do your own supporting research – beyond the prescribed and recommended reading).
Note: You need to write analytical report. This will have a significant impact on your response, style and tone of your report writing style. In an analytical report – context and some necessary background are important, this is similar to an ‘Introduction’ but avoid using this heading. In a report the introduction is usually termed the ‘Terms of Reference’ OR ‘Scope of the Report’. Please be clear that a report is not an essay – some guidance is provided in the programme handbook on this and the study skills pages on the university website below. Also,
it is crucial to understand and follow the principles of academic writing.
The conclusion and recommendations should result from the analysis. As suggested in the study skills guidance a conclusion must not introduce any new information – you pull together the most significant key points in a brief summary. Your recommendations must logically flow from your conclusions. Therefore, this is not an additional discussion section, discussion/findings/analysis needs to be covered in your main body. With this in mind, the recommendation section will be short – each recommendation should be presented in a list and numbered (this specifically refers to task 4 in the brief).
Comprehension
You will need to demonstrate a good understanding of the theory, principles and concepts learnt on the Operations Management module. Better students will demonstrate a comprehensive and strong command of the subject matter. To do this, students will need to utilise good scholarship skills in terms of understanding and interpreting the case, reading of learning materials and text and certainly engagement with the academic literature. Scholarly skills are gained by going beyond what you have learnt reading the unit guides. It will be evident to the marker, whether you engaged with each of the activities in the units to further your knowledge. Also, whether you had conducted your own search of the literature databases in the relevant subject area and in relation to addressing the needs of the case.
Command will be evident in the way in which you use what you have learnt beyond text books and course materials to develop your line argument and to provide an evidence base for each argument. You do not need to force everything you read into your assignment – be selective by concentrating on the necessary evidence (e.g. citations) to support what you are arguing.
If citations do not fit with the line of argument then it simply is not needed. This is why many find it difficult to keep within the word count. A good starting point will be the articles noted in the case (perhaps take a look at each article reference list too).
Analysis
Your analysis is about the way in which you present your answer to the assignment brief questions. You will need to take account of an appropriate structure, accurate use concepts/theories, and good use of evidence. Better students will be conscious of the ‘coherence’ of the argument. This needs to be tightly-focused which will be a result of students creating an ‘argument outline’ and detailed plan after exploring extensively the literature and assimilated understanding to offer new interpretations in relation to the case. Students achieving the highest bands of grade will provide a mature answer with a degree of originality in the development of concepts and theories and novel application in practice.
Critique
You should be able to understand and reproduce relevant, arguments, debates and/or interpretations that you have learnt on the module and from your reading. Pay particular attention to evaluating what you acquire so that you can demonstrate capacity for independent thought. It is this ‘capacity’ that will determine your banding within this criterion. This is why it is important to develop this ‘capacity’ by undertaking all the activities in each of these units.
These activities have been designed to help you to understand and evaluate relevant arguments, debates and/or interpretations in relation to various different industrial contexts and practical application. You will benefit greatly also by reflecting upon practice in relation to what you have gained from the workplace and/or thinking about the practical application of what you have learnt to future employability or areas of interest. Better students will have developed a highly developed capacity for originality and independent thought. If this is your first assignment on this programme, don’t worry – the more you engage in your learning, unit activities, help clinics and reflective practice tasks the quicker you will acquire this skill.
Presentation
Students will need to show awareness of techniques of academic writing with particular reference to structure, referencing/sourcing and spelling grammar. The way in which you employ academic writing techniques will differentiate you in terms of grade banding. Ensure that you provide a fluent and well-structured deployment of techniques in academic writing. It will be worth reading some ‘study skills’ texts on academic writing and ensure you understand the difference between report and essay writing. Many students often provide a weak or even no conclusion – every document must have a strong conclusion and it is often regarded as the main part of the document. Make sure that the conclusion is relevant and compelling – it sums up your argument closely, demonstrating clear understanding, with some independent thought and recommendations for the practicing manager.
The assignment is also in a report format, so you are expected to include an Executive Summary. An Executive Summary states the key findings and recommendations made in the report. This needs to be a clear statement, note this will be the first section the marker will read – readers should be able to grasp the key elements and be signposted to the major discussions/presentation of findings in the report. Any recommendations made must reflect and be aligned to the discussion in the main body.
Please take a look at the following guidelines for you to use as a checklist prior to
submission:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!