Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Subject: Other
Topic: Observed Ethical Issue
Paper details:Please choose a situation from your workplace (past or present) in which you see an ethical issue. On the lines of what Damon Horovitz has done on the Ted talks, please analyze and propose solutions to your ethical issue from three different ethical perspectives. Pick your ethical perspectives from the list that Goodpaster provides in his note.
Please do not do an abstract! The paper should be 4-5 pages long, double-spaced with size 10-12 font.
Due Monday at 6:00 AM Eastern time. This is a graded activity. Refer to the rubric to see how your work will be assessed.
Hints for Success
When your assignment requires research, remember to use credible sources, add in-text citations to give credit where credit is due, and provide references using APA style. If APA is new to you, review the APA resources in the Student Resource Center.Reviewing Feedback
Your instructor will grade your assignment and provide feedback on your work in the following way(s):Scores using the rubric. Note that your instructor may also add comments on individual line items
General comments about your work, which will show under the rubric and arrive as a message in your inbox
Mark-ups on your actual document: Viewing Teacher Document FeedbackLinks to an external site.
Rubric
Individual Assignment Rubric v.2
Individual Assignment Rubric v.2
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
30 pts
Assignment demonstrates excellent use of various critical thinking standards and concepts. These may include proper use of logic, reasoning and the posing of well-considered questions.
25 pts
Assignment makes very good use of critical thinking skills. These may include proper use of logic, reasoning and the posing of well-considered questions.
20 pts
Assignment makes only limited use of critical thinking skills.
15 pts
Assignment mainly restates concepts and ideas of others without applying critical thinking skills.
0 pts
Unacceptable or not submitted.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Development
30 pts
Content is very comprehensive and supported by detailed references to lectures and readings. Thoroughly evaluates the impact, creativity, and value of the subject.
25 pts
Content is comprehensive and supported by some references to lectures and readings. Major points are generally stated and supported. Evaluates the impact, creativity, and value of the subject.
20 pts
Content is somewhat comprehensive. Not supported by references to readings and lectures. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought. Level of impact, creativity, and value of the subject is not communicated thoroughly.
15 pts
Content is incomplete. No quotes are used. Nothing more than short summary of content.
0 pts
Not submitted or unacceptable
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Length
15 pts
Appropriate tool is used (submitted as a Word document). The organization is clear and easy to follow. The assignment follows the suggested word count.
13 pts
Appropriate tool is used (submitted as a Word document). The organization is mostly clear and easy to follow. The assignment follows the suggested word count
12 pts
Appropriate tool is used (submitted as a Word document). The organization is somewhat easy to follow. The assignment is fairly close to the suggested word count.
10 pts
Inappropriate tool used; the assignment cannot be accessed by the instructor. The organization and structure detract from the message. The assignment does not follow the suggested word count.
0 pts
Not submitted or unacceptable
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSentence Structure, Grammar, Spelling and APA Form and Style
15 pts
Sentences are structured correctly. There are no grammatical or spelling errors. There is use of proper APA form and style, where appropriate. No abstract please.
14 pts
Sentences are structured correctly. There are no more than 3 grammatical or spelling errors. There is use of mostly proper APA form and style, where appropriate. No abstract please.
12 pts
Sentences are generally structured correctly. There are more than 5 grammatical or spelling errors. There is an attempt at APA form and style, where appropriate.
11 pts
There are more than 5 grammatical or spelling errors There is little or no attempt at APA form and style, where appropriate.
0 pts
Not submitted or unacceptable
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimely Submission
10 pts
Assignment is submitted on a timely basis.
7 pts
Assignment is one day late.
6 pts
Assignment is two to six days late.
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 100
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!