mouth throat models and inspiratory flow profiles
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Sources:–(To be decided by writer. It is a must to cite all sources you use unless otherwise specified in the instructions)Subject: OtherTopic: The mouth-throat models and inspiratory flow profiles in in vitro analytics of dry powder inhalersPaper details:
REVISION REVISION FILE: 13136853 Client: hi! please do a literature review about how other researchers have used of flow profiles with anatomical mouth throat models in NGI or other cascade methods and write about these studies because now there is only one study by Cheng. the writer should do the literature review. It involves comparing the client’s results to other researcher’s work. The client’s results are in the two pdf documents named : Analysis Results 26.3 and Describing the Analysis Results The writer should use the draft named; Draft results, in guiding the writing of the literature review.
hi! Here are results in first document, then is little bit more information about results and then draft document where is information about how to write about the discussion of results(need to write about paragraphs 3.1.-3.5 . Writer need to compare, analyze and argue my results to what have been earlier found with another researchers in earlier studies. analysis results 26.3..pdf [MATERIAL] Describing the analysis results.docx [MATERIAL] draft-results.docx [MATERIAL] The INITIAL instructions Work need to be ready at least 12.4.2021. You can start writing when I have submitted to you my results, I hope I will get results ready for you within 2-3 weeks.
So I need written of results and discussion part for Master Thesis . I will send introduction and results part of Thesis for you later. Note! The current instructions for the Research Thesis are modified from the technical guidelines for manuscripts intended for submission into the Journal of Cell Biology http://jcb.rupress.org/ifora. Also use Arial font size 12 for all text, line spacing 1.5. Guidelines for Results: The results are often depicted as figures and tables. Number of those is not limited to the instructions of Journal of Cell Biology. The figure is usually a more visual way of presenting the data and therefore preferred over the tables. The text will explain the central meaning of the figures and tables. Figures and tables are numbered and should be placed as near as possible to that text part where they are discussed. Each figure needs to have a figure legend which is placed below the figure.
The figure legend should contain so much information that the figure can be understood without reading the full text chapter. When needed, the figures should contain a scale bar (microscopic pictures), molecular weight markers (gel electrophoresis) etc. The table legends are placed above the table, and also here the legend should contain enough information so that the table can be understood independently without reading the text. Clarifying footnotes may be appended to the tables. Footnotes are marked as superscripts in the table and then explained as footnotes below the table. Abbreviations that are used only in a table should be defined in the table legend. Results section does not normally contain references, unless the used literature has direct links to results
. The results section is usually written in the imperfect tense. 5 from scratch + 7 paraphrasing Guidelines for part of Discussion: This is the most important part of the Thesis, which distinguishes the outstanding Thesis from an average Thesis. The aim of the discussion is to present the new results in light of the previous findings of the field and in relation to the questions presented in the introduction. It should not only repeat the obtained results with the references to literature, but the current data should be linked to a more general framework.
This is the section which measures how well the student understands the meaning and importance of his/her work, and can present opinions and conclusions about his/her own work and relate the new data with the already known scientific facts and details, impact on the society and/or human health. The results are compared with earlier research work dealing with similar types of problems and questions to be able to generate larger complexes of new information. Basic textbooks or general reviews should not be used as references, but earlier research publications about similar topics and questions.
If the obtained data does not fit with the previously published findings, the possible sources of discrepancy should be carefully examined and evaluated. If this examination shows that the sources of error cannot explain the unexpected observations, it is important to bring up the new solutions and their more general importance. If the discussion section is extensive, it can end with a summary, where the key results and their conclusions are clearly and concisely presented. The discussion is usually written in the present tense.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!