Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
DNP-PROJECT
I need the following questions answered in about 150 words eachDQ-1
Review “Criticism and Judgment: A Critical Look at Scientific Peer Review,” located in topic materials.
Discuss the importance of incorporating feedback from a peer review process and dealing with the experience of uncertainty it may create for both the author and the reviewer. You may share whatever information from your peer review that you are comfortable sharing.
Why is peer review so important and how can we use peer review or the professional critique offered to us to improve our scholarly position?
RESOURCES
Hope, A. A., & Munro, C. L. (2019). Criticism and judgment: A critical look at scientific peer review. American Journal of Critical Care, 28(4), 242–245.
URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137294238&site=ehost-live&scope=site
DQ-2
View “Privacy & Health Research in a Data-Driven World” located in topic materials.
After viewing the video, discuss how you plan to protect your patient’s privacy within your project.
RESOURCES
View “Privacy & Health Research in a Data-Driven World,” located on the NIH Videocasting website.
URL:https://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?Live=33360&start=182&duration=8224&bhcp=1
DQ-3
Review “Why Causal Inference Matters to Nurses: The Case of Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes,” located in topic materials.
How would you define and imply causal inference relative to your quasi-experimental designed project and separate it from bias and other factors that may influence it?
RESOURCES
Costa, D. K., & Yakusheva, O. (2016). Why causal inference matters to nurses: The case of nurse staffing and patient outcomes. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(2), 1. doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol21No02Man02
URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hch&AN=116288407&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1
DQ-4
Review “Information Bias in Health Research: Definition, Pitfalls, and Adjustment Methods,” located in topic materials.
Using your project proposal, provide an example of each of the types of errors described in the article.
RESOURCES
Althubaiti, A. (2016). Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2016(1), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S104807
URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.b1da50f685f4486d809494257f7e7181&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1
DQ-5
Examine your process of data collection and how you will maintain patient privacy during your intervention. How can the Christian worldview of carrying out work within the public arena with compassion, justice, and concern for the common good affect data collection and patient privacy?
DQ-6
Review “Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics: Clinical Importance Versus Statistical Significance in Research,” located in topic materials.
Provide examples of how you addressed feasibility and statistical versus clinical significance in your proposal. For example, why did you select a four-week time frame for your project versus a power analysis? Did you select this because it was feasible? Why or why not and explain.
What is the difference between clinical and statistical significance and why are both important to the patient improvement outcomes of your project?
RESOURCES
Mellis, C. (2018). Lies, damned lies and statistics: Clinical importance versus statistical significance in research. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 25, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2017.02.002
URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S1526054217300088&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1
DQ-8
Review “How to Make APA Format Tables and Figures Using Microsoft Word,” located in topic materials. Create a table of your proposed analysis including descriptive data in a Word document. Upload it to the discussion forum.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!