Financial Decision-Making Report for SKANSKA PLC
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Financial Decision-making report for SKANSKA PLC. A construction company based in UK, started back in 1984.
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
- Introduction (300 words)
When was the company started and where?
What do they sell, what countries are they present in, number of employees working for them, their annual turnover figure and market share? A brief SWOT analysis of the company
- TASK 1 (15000 words)-Cover the following departments:
2.1 Accounting department (defined and give an introduction of the department)
- Financial accounting (what is doing in general and its functions in Skanska PLS)
- Management accounting (what is doing in general and its functions in Skanska PLS)
- Tax function (what is doing in general and its functions in Skanska PLS)
- Auditing function (what is doing in general and its functions in Skanska PLS)
2.2 Finance department: (defined and give an introduction of the department)
- Investment function (what is doing in general and its functions in Skanska PLS)
- Financing function what is doing in general and its functions in Skanska PLS)
- Dividend function what is doing in general and its functions in Skanska PLS)
- Working capital function what is doing in general and its functions in Skanska PLS)
You need to provide general explanations of all the eight points mentioned above and relate it to the company with relevant examples from the case
- TASK 2 (1000 words)
Part a: Calculation of the 5 ratios using the correct formulas for each year (2018 and 2019)
- ROCE
- Net profit margin
- Current ratio
- Debtor’s collection period
- Creditor’s collection period
The summarised financial statements of SKANSKA PLC, a Public company engaged in Construction, are shown below: Statement of profit and loss:
Part b: For this part, you are providing analysis of the results of the ratios calculated above. You need to provide analysis of each of the five ratios separately
- ROCE
- Definition
- What does the ratio indicate about the company’s performance?
- Compare 2018 figures with the 2019 figures calculated above. Explain what do these numbers mean and how has the figure changes in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Reasons behind the value of the ratio going down in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Ways to improve the value of the ratio in the future
- Net profit margin
- Definition
- What does the ratio indicate about the company’s performance?
- Compare 2018 figures with the 2019 figures calculated above. Explain what do these numbers mean and how has the figure changes in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Reasons behind the value of the ratio going down in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Ways to improve the value of the ratio in the future
- Current ratio
- Definition
- What does the ratio indicate about the company’s performance?
- Compare 2018 figures with the 2019 figures calculated above. Explain what do these numbers mean and how has the figure changes in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Reasons behind the value of the ratio going down in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Ways to improve the value of the ratio in the future
- Debtor’s collection period
- Definition
- What does the ratio indicate about the company’s performance?
- Compare 2018 figures with the 2019 figures calculated above. Explain what do these numbers mean and how has the figure changes in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Reasons behind the value of the ratio going down in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Ways to improve the value of the ratio in the future
- Creditor’s collection period
- Definition
- What does the ratio indicate about the company’s performance?
- Compare 2018 figures with the 2019 figures calculated above. Explain what do these numbers mean and how has the figure changes in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Reasons behind the value of the ratio going down in 2019 as compared to 2018
- Ways to improve the value of the ratio in the future
Conclusion/Recommendation (200 words)
You will be providing recommendations on whether Camden Limited should go ahead with granting loan of £1 million to Skanska PLC or not along with justification. The answer will be based on the calculation and analysis of the ratios you did in Task 2.
References – 15, including at least 5 books
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!