Final Project Plan Report Submission
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Instructions for completing the paper
This is the component that you must complete.
hellofresh is the name of the company.
Chart of Timelines and Milestones (Joe) YES Can be included as an MS-Project file, however we recommend that you draw the presentation’s most important visual elements, perhaps using the Milestone chart.
For instance, 4.0 Sequence and Schedule.Project Plan Report and Team Presentation – Team Assignment
Files to be attached:
OregonStateU-RiskRegister.xlsx is a spreadsheet created by Oregon State University (211.069 KB)
File FINAL PAPER – sample Project Plan Report.pdf – Solar Array Project – Paradise, CA (2.953 MB)
Template for a Communications Matrix in Excel Format.xls (52.5 KB)
Items to Include in Project Management Plan.docx is a document that lists the items that should be included in the project management plan (15.369 KB)
Submission of the final project. See the PDF Syllabus, which includes the following essential elements for your convenience:Submission of the Final Project Plan Report (32 Points)
The major objective of your team’s work in this course is a collection of project elements from a project management plan, which will be submitted in the form of a Summary Report to show key stakeholders that your team has a robust project plan in place for executing their project. As a result, the report should be more than just a collection of data; it should flow and show how the various project tools and artifacts (charter, budget, Gantt Chart, Risk Register, Communications Matrix, and so on) flow and highlight the soundness of your plan. The instructor will provide a detailed list of the items that must be included as well as those that are optional. This is the most important part of your grade, and the goal is for students to produce something that is both academically sophisticated and representative of what project managers must actually deliver in their organizations. To help students even more, the instructor will provide examples and templates to aid in the production of these project management plan parts, as needed (example: a risk register and heat map).
A template for constructing a heat map is included below, as well as another file that has both a heat map and a risk register. Use them whatever you like.
RiskAssessmentTool withHeatMap-1.xlsm Heatmap – REM.xlsx
The following is a breakdown of how the points in the Final Project were graded.
Report on the Project Plan SectionPoints
Comments
Charter/Scope
3
a template has been provided
WBS
4
Because it is a demonstration of scope, it has been given additional points.
Diagrams of Networks
4
The hand-drawn network should be included as an appendix, and the computer-generated Network Diagram should be included as well.
Gantt Diagram
3
This is provided by MS-Project or other software, and it is recommended that the.mpp file be attached.
Baseline Costs (Budget)
2
a template has been provided
Register of Threats
4
a template has been provided
Matrix of Communication
2
a template has been provided
Learned Lessons
3
Discuss your team’s learnings, including team dynamics.
Connections/Structure/Support
7
How you provide context, references, and linkages between each tool and how it was utilized.
Total
32
The following are the criteria for earning points on the individual elements:
how successfully your team communicated that they understood the topic and were able to use the tool
The tool’s overall appearance and clarity in conveying information.
Remember that a PM’s job is 90% communication, and one form of communication is visually presenting information in a way that is intuitively evident.
For example, if the Work Packages are truly assignable, schedule-able, and budget-able, and the appearance and format are consistent with what we presented in class, and it contains the full scope of both the product and the project, and it is very well-drawn (appeals to the eye), it can earn all four points.As you can see from the table, the single most important factor is how the collection is organized, presented, and supported (shown in bold above).
If the team merely supplies a zipped collection of files for the elements, they won’t score well.
Here are the characteristics that contribute to a perfect 7 out of 7 for this last aspect.
Introductory text: a paragraph or two (with references if possible) explaining what the reader is about to see and why it is significant. This should come before each of the preceding elements.
The team describes how the elements (which reflect scope, schedule, money, and maybe risk, communications, stakeholder management) depend on and interact in the opening language of each element and/or at the end, in a Summary paragraph.
Organize your structure in a logical, easy-to-understand manner.
The use of English is clear, and the grammar is reasonable, at least to the point of being unobtrusive.
Appendices to support the project’s charter and objectives, as well as references and importance
Benefits of Connectivity Realization and long-term viability
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!