Critique of an article on organizational behavior
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Critique of an article on organizational behavior
Assignment on Article Critique
You must critically examine and assess a scholarly article’s merits, faults, and contributions to the field of study in this project. Learning how to criticize a journal article has a number of advantages, including preparing you for future publication and keeping you up to date on the literature in your profession. The practical application is to improve your capacity to look at research within your business and industry with a critical, knowledgeable eye. Many journals are subscribed to by the University of the Cumberlands (UC) Library, and you will have access to appropriate collections to support this project. Locate and read the following peer-reviewed articles using the UC Library: K. De Meulenaere, S. De Winne, E. Marescaux, and S. Vanormelingen. De Meulenaere, S. De Winne, S. De Winne, S. De Winne, S. De Winne, S. De Winne, S. De Winne, S. (2021). The impact of firm size and knowledge intensity on collective turnover performance. 993-1023 in Journal of Management. I. Weller, J. Süß, H. Evanschitzky, and F. von Wangenheim. I. Weller, J. Süß, J. Süß, J. Süß, J. Süß, J. Süß, J. Süß, J. Süß (2020). Customer happiness, high-performance work system consensus, and transformational leadership. Journal of Management, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1469-1497. V. K. Gupta, S. C. Mortal, S. Silveri, M. Sun, and D. B. Turban (2020). You’ve been fired! Disparities in CEO dismissal by gender. Journal of Management, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 560-582. D. R. Marshall, W. D. Davis, C. Dibrell, and A. P. Ammeter (2019). Examining part-time entrepreneurs as inventive employees while learning on the job. 3091-3113 in Journal of Management, 45(8). T. A. Paterson and L. Huang (2019). Is it expected of me to be moral? A perspective on ethical leadership and unethical action from the perspective of role definition. Journal of Management, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2837-2860. J. Pak and S. Kim (2018). Implementation by team managers, the intensity of high-performance work systems, and performance: a multilevel examination Journal of Management, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 2690-2715. After you’ve finished your review, pick one article from the list and critically analyze its merits, shortcomings, and contribution to the field of study using the outline below as a guide: Page 1 of the bookThe following information will be included on the cover page:
Articles Author and Title (s)
Journal’s Title (s)
Publication date:
Your given name
Summary of the ReportSummarize the most important features of the entire article, such as the article’s overarching purpose and general area of research.
The study’s focus is on a specific topic.
The article’s primary conclusions.
Review of the LiteratureSummarize the main points raised in the Literature Review in a few sentences.
Was the literature review relevant to the study, up to date, and comprehensive?
Were there any gaps in the review of literature?
Analyze the dataWhat approach did you use: qualitative, quantitative, or mixed? Was the methods selected for the study appropriate? Why do you think that is?
Was the data analysis able to support or refute the study questions? Explain.
Results/ConclusionYou will address the following topics in this section:
Describe how the article relates to your field of study.
Outline the article’s advantages and disadvantages. Be as precise as possible.
What do you believe needs to be done in this area in the future, based on the article?
After reading the article, what are your main points and takeaways?
In-text APA citations must be used correctly. The review must be word-processed and double-spaced, with a length of no less than two pages and no more than five pages. The cover page, abstract, and references page are not included in the length of the paper (s).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!