Care Coordination Oral Presentation to Colleagues
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
- Develop a 4-5 page oral presentation for nursing colleagues highlighting the fundamental principles of care coordination.
Nurses have a powerful role in the coordination and continuum of care. All nurses must be cognizant of the care coordination process and how safety, ethics, policy, physiological, and cultural needs affect care and patient outcomes. As a nurse, care coordination is something that should always be considered. Nurses must be aware of factors that impact care coordination and of a continuum of care that utilizes community resources effectively and is part of an ethical framework that represents the professionalism of nurses. Understanding policy elements helps nurses coordinate care effectively.
This assessment provides an opportunity for you to educate your peers on the care coordination process. The assessment also requires you to address change management issues. You are encouraged to complete the Managing Change activity.
Preparation
Your nurse manager has been observing your effectiveness as a care coordinator and recognizes the importance of educating other staff nurses in care coordination. Consequently, she has asked you to develop a presentation for your colleagues on care coordination basics. By providing them with basic information about the care coordination process, you will assist them in taking on an expanded role in helping to manage the care coordination process and improve patient outcomes in your community care center.
To prepare for this assessment, identify key factors nurses must consider to effectively participate in the care coordination process.
Instructions
Develop an oral presentation for nursing colleagues highlighting the fundamental principles of care coordination. Include community resources, ethical issues, and policy issues that affect the coordination of care.
Supporting Evidence
Cite 3–5 credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your oral presentation.
Grading Requirements
The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Care Coordination Presentation to Colleagues Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
- Outline effective strategies for collaborating with patients and their families to achieve desired health outcomes.
- Provide, for example, drug-specific educational interventions, cultural competence strategies.
- Include evidence that you have to support your selected strategies.
- Identify the aspects of change management that directly affect elements of the patient experience essential to the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care.
- Explain the rationale for coordinated care plans based on ethical decision making.
- Consider the reasonable implications and consequences of an ethical approach to care and any underlying assumptions that may influence decision making.
- Identify the potential impact of specific health care policy provisions on outcomes and patient experiences.
- What are the logical implications and consequences of relevant policy provisions?
- What evidence do you have to support your conclusions?
- Raise awareness of the nurse’s vital role in the coordination and continuum of care in a video-recorded presentation. Script and reference list are not submitted.
- Stay focused on key issues of import with respect to the effects of resources, ethics, and policy on the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care.
Care Coordination Presentation to Colleagues Scoring Guide
Care Coordination Presentation to Colleagues Scoring Guide Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished Outline effective strategies for collaborating with patients and their families to achieve desired health outcomes. Does not outlines strategies for collaborating with patients and their families to achieve desired health outcomes. Outlines strategies for collaborating with patients and their families to achieve desired health outcomes. Outlines effective strategies for collaborating with patients and their families to achieve desired health outcomes. Outlines effective, evidence-based, and culturally sensitive strategies for collaborating with patients and their families to achieve desired health outcomes. Ensures the strategies are well-supported by credible evidence. Identify the aspects of change management that directly affect elements of the patient experience essential to the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care. Does not identify the aspects of change management that directly affect elements of the patient experience essential to the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care. Identifies aspects of change management not relevant to the patient experience, emphasizes patient expectations, or identifies aspects of the patient experience with minor impact on the quality of care. Identifies the aspects of change management that directly affect elements of the patient experience essential to the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care. Identifies the aspects of change management that directly affect elements of the patient experience essential to the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care. Focuses on aspects of care highly valued by patients, and distinguishes between patient experience and patient satisfaction.
Explain the rationale for coordinated care plans based on ethical decision making. Does not explain the rationale for coordinated care plans based on ethical decision making. Explains the rationale for coordinated care plans based on ethical decision making, but reaches conclusions based on a simplistic, biased, or cursory examination of the issue. Explains the rationale for coordinated care plans based on ethical decision making. Explains the rationale for coordinated care plans based on ethical decision making. Identifies the logical implications and consequences of an ethical approach to care, and articulates underlying assumptions that guide decision making.
Identify the potential impact of specific health care policy provisions on outcomes and patient experiences. Does not identify policies affecting the provision of health care. Identifies policies affecting the provision of health care. Identifies the potential impact of specific health care policy provisions on outcomes and patient experiences. Identifies the potential impact of specific health care policy provisions on outcomes and patient experiences. Draws logical, evidence-based conclusions from an insightful interpretation of relevant and significant policy provisions.
Raise awareness of the nurse’s vital role in the coordination and continuum of care. Does not address the nurse’s role in the coordination and continuum of care. Addresses the nurse’s role in the coordination and continuum of care. Raises awareness of the nurse’s vital role in the coordination and continuum of care. Raises awareness of the nurse’s vital role in the coordination and continuum of care. Clearly establishes the importance and relevance of the nurse’s role in an engaging and memorable oral presentation and an APA-formatted reference list.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!