BL240 Code of Honor Statement and United Nutrition Associates Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Question Description
This is the second written assignment in BL 240. Before you begin the assignment, re-read that portion of the course syllabus (see Modules>Getting Started>Syllabus) dealing with “Written Assignments” to ensure that you understand the format (cover page plus no more than two type-written double spaced pages, content of the cover page, Code of Honor statement, etc.). You will be graded both on your response to the assignment and on having followed the directions (format). Note: The legal issues in WA2 may cover any of the material in Unit 2 plus may include secondary (minor) issues from Unit 1. Remember that verbiage will not be rewarded. Listing the issues and the controlling law for each issue is all that is necessary. The object is for you to show me that you understand the material in Unit 2 and can apply it to a specific fact set.
Written Assignment #2: Kyle is looking to move Alabama Sunshine to a higher level. His canned and dried produce lines are growing but he wants to push his new hot sauce, salsa, and condiment lines. He sees the organically grown produce operation as gaining a solid, well-rooted consumer base; however, Kyle wants to expand beyond seasonal produce. He needs a way to communicate an identity for his new products and, after considerable thought, settles on the name Kyle’s Fantastic Condiments, a name that Kyle believes will stick to the plates and palates of his patrons. Kyle has successfully gotten the hot sauce, salsa, and condiment lines into the United Nutrition Associates (UNA) grocery stores in Florence, Madison, and Huntsville, AL, and has placed red and white billboards along I-20 in Tennessee and Alabama advertising his new products; his new market in Jasper, AL; and his new company website (KFC.com). The slogan of his new venture, which he uses in radio and TV ads, is “KFC, your assurance of fantastic farm fresh, family-focused, affordable food.” Shortly thereafter, Kyle received a certified letter from a well-know, nation-wide chain restaurant, Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), alleging harm to its business interests, including infringement of and dilution of its trademark and trade name.
Undeterred and determined to put some spice into his profit margin and give customers a new taste, Kyle decided to kick off the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday season by introducing a special offer pack of his hot sauce, salsa, and condiments, calling it the KFC Variety Pack. The variety packs are now stocked in all of UNA’s grocery stores and have proven to be so successful that the stores quickly sold out. Now UNA wants more of Kyle’s product. UNA’s chief financial officer (CFO), Candace B. Ritenoff, calls Kyle promising to buy all of the KFC Variety Packs that Alabama Sunshine can produce within the next 30 days and promises to mail a deposit of $15,000 immediately to seal the deal. Unfortunately, Kyle was out-of-town, having decided to celebrate the forthcoming holiday season early by touring the Mobile Bay area to relax and look for new business opportunities. The CFO left the offer on Kyle’s office phone voice mail and Kyle did not get the message until a week later when he returned to Jasper. He immediately called Scooter, his production manager, telling him to crank up production of the value packs by running the plant 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and promising Scooter a hefty bonus “if UNA’s needs are met”. The sudden activity, promise of the bonus, and associated pressures caused Scooter to relapse back to his old substance abuse habit, requiring that he be admitted to a residential detox facility in Savannah, TN, but not before he had gotten the revised production schedule operational at the plant.
Kyle is concerned about the letter from the national restaurant company, doesn’t want to get in a protracted and costly legal battle, and comes to you, his faithful college friend, for counsel. Kyle mentions that, after telling his farm field production workers about restaurant company’s cease and desist letter, some of them became angry, fearing for their jobs, and threw overripe carrots and bell peppers at passing Kentucky Fried Chicken trucks, causing one of the drivers to run off the highway, striking several utility poles. Kyle is also concerned that, since he has contracts with Slogan-Advantage Advertising for the billboards and WLEO radio station for “on-air” commercials, he could wind up losing a lot of money. As a passing comment, Kyle mentions that he also has a contract with Intensified Tide Computer Services (ITCS) for the maintenance of the Alabama Sunshine/Kyle’s Fantastic Condiments website and asks your counsel about the offer from UNA’s CFO and whether he may have to pay Scooter the bonus as promised.
Note: As with all Written Assignments, WA2 has a point value of 25 points. This is to be your own work with no help offered, given, or accepted as per our Class Code of Honor.
To help you organize your thoughts, I suggest that you read the fact set; decide which facts are relevant and which are merely verbiage; based on the information in Unit 2 (note that WA2 may also include information found in Unit 1), decide which legal information is relevant to the issues; then state the relevant legal issues and state clearly the relevant law.
RUBRIC
Quality of Response No Response Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!