A Fact Sheet And A Comparison Grid For The Agenda
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
A Fact Sheet And A Comparison Grid For The Agenda
Healthcare may appear to you to have been a matter of national debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.
Healthcare has been a policy issue and a source of controversy since the administration of John Adams, the second president of the United States. In 1798, Adams enacted legislation requiring sailors to set away 20 cents per month from their wages to meet medical expenses. This was the first major piece of healthcare legislation in the United States, and the issue has since been intertwined into presidential agendas and political discussion.
You may be asked to contribute expertise, guidance, and/or comments on healthcare issues while they are debated for inclusion in new policy as a healthcare practitioner. You may also be involved in the development of new organizational policies and responses to legislative changes. For all of these reasons, you should be prepared to discuss current national healthcare challenges.
You will examine recent presidential healthcare agendas in this assignment. You’ll also create a fact sheet to highlight the importance of a healthcare issue as well as the influence of recent or prospective policies on this issue.
How to Get Ready:
Examine the current/sitting U.S. president’s and the two previous presidential administrations’ agenda priorities.
Choose a healthcare topic that has been addressed by each of the last three presidential administrations in the United States.
Consider the focus of their distinct agendas, as well as the financial resources allocated to tackling the healthcare issue you chose.
Consider how you would convey the relevance of a healthcare issue to a politician or member of their staff in order for it to be included on an agenda.
The Assignment: A title page, an introduction, a goal statement, and a conclusion with a 1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-page Analysis, and 1-page narrative. This is an APA-formatted paper.Part 1: Grid for comparing agendas
Complete Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the two past presidential administrations’ agendas connected to the public health concern you picked using the Agenda Comparison Grid Template provided in the Learning Resources. Make certain to address the following points:
Identify and describe the population health concern you’ve chosen, as well as the variables that contribute to it.
Describe the focus of the administrative agenda on the problem you choose.
Determine how much money and other resources the current and two previous presidents set aside for this issue.
Explain how each presidential administration dealt with the problem.
A minimum of three resources must be employed.
Part 2: Comparison Grid Analysis of the AgendaComplete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis section of the template using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid:
Which administrative agency is most likely to assist you in addressing the healthcare issue you’ve chosen?
How do you believe the current and two past presidents will address your chosen healthcare issue? How does it manage to stay put?
Who would you pick as the entrepreneur, advocate, and sponsor of the healthcare problem you chose for the current and two past presidents?
Part 3: StorytellingCreate a 1-page narrative using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2 to speak with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff about this healthcare issue. Make certain to address the following points:
Explain why this healthcare issue is critical and should be addressed on the legislative agenda.
Justify the nurse’s role in setting the agenda for healthcare concerns.
At least two outside resources and 2-3 course-specific materials are thoroughly integrated into the response, which fully supports the summary presented.
Part 1: Comparison Grid for Agendas--Identify a public health issue that needs to be addressed.
-Explain the Population Health issue you choose and the elements that influence it.
(5) (5 percent ) + 5 (5 percent )
The response identifies and characterizes a community health risk in a straightforward and accurate manner.
a) (4 percent ) 4 (4 percent )
The response only obliquely acknowledges and outlines a public health issue.
3.0 (3.5 percent ) -3.5% (3.5 percent )
The comment incorrectly identifies and explains a problem with population health.
ZERO (0 percent ) + 3 (3 percent )
A population health concern’s identification and description is missing or incomplete.
Part 1: Comparison Grid for Agendas-– Describe the current and two previous presidents’ administrative agenda priorities on this topic.
– Determine how much money and other resources the current and two previous presidents allotted to this issue.
– Describe how each presidential administration dealt with the issue.
– 20 – 18 % – 18 % – 18 % – 18 % – (20 percent )
The response describes the presidential administrations’ focus on the topic, the financial and resource allocation allocated to the issue, and how each presidential administration tackled the issue in a straightforward and accurate manner. There are at least three resources used.
16 (16%) – 17 (16%) (17 percent )
The response describes the presidential administrations’ concentration on the subject, the financial and resource allocation committed to the issue, and how each presidential administration treated the issue in a general way. There are only two resources used.
14th (14 percent ) 15 – (15 percent )
The response misrepresents the presidential administrations’ focus on the subject, as well as the financial and resource allocations committed to the issue and how each presidential administration treated the issue. There is only one resource used.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (13 percent )
There is no description of the presidential administrations’ focus on the subject, budgetary and resource allocation for the issue, or explanation of how each presidential administration treated the topic. There are no resources used.
Part 2: Analysis of the Agenda Comparison Grid- Address the following:-Which administrative agency would most likely be in charge of assisting you in dealing with the healthcare issue you chose?
-How do you think your chosen healthcare issue will be addressed? How does it manage to stay put?
-Who would you pick as the entrepreneur, advocate, or sponsor of the healthcare problem you chose for the current and former presidents?
23 percent – 25 percent – 23 percent – 23 percent – 23 percent – 23 percent – 23 percent (25 percent )
-The response identifies an administrative agency that is most likely to be in charge of dealing with the selected healthcare issue in a straightforward and accurate manner.
-Response illustrates how the healthcare problem gets on the agenda and stays there in a clear and truthful manner.
– The response clearly and accurately identifies the healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/champion/sponsor.
20. (20 percent ) 22 – (22 percent )
-The response obliquely specifies an administrative agency that might be in charge of dealing with the chosen healthcare issue.
-Response adequately shows how the healthcare problem becomes and stays on the agenda.
-Identification of the healthcare issue’s entrepreneur, advocate, or sponsor is hazy.
eighteen (18 percent ) 19 – (19 percent )
-The administrative agency in charge of dealing with the selected health-care concern is incorrectly identified.
-The explanation of how the healthcare problem gets on the agenda and stays there is either ambiguous or false.
-The entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare problem chosen is incorrect or does not correspond to the healthcare issue.
17 – 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 (17 percent )
-An administrative agency in charge of dealing with the chosen healthcare concern has not been identified.
-Explanation of how the healthcare problem gets on the table and stays there is either ambiguous or absent.
-Identification of the healthcare issue’s entrepreneur/champion/sponsor is ambiguous and erroneous, or none at all.
Narrative:Create a 1-2-page narrative based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare topic you chose to speak with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff about this healthcare issue.
-Explain why this healthcare issue is critical and should be placed on the legislative agenda.
-Define the nurse’s role in setting the agenda for healthcare issues 32 (32 percent ) 35 – (35 percent )
Produces a well-developed, truthful, and compelling story.The response includes a comprehensive, detailed, and precise synthesis of two outside materials on why this healthcare issue is critical and should be addressed on the legislative agenda. At least two outside resources and 2-3 course-specific materials are thoroughly integrated into the response, which fully supports the summary presented.
The role of the nurse in establishing the agenda for healthcare concerns is accurately and comprehensively justified in the responses.
31 (28%) – 28 (28%) – 28 (28%) – 28 (28%) – 28 (31 percent )
Produces a detailed and accurate narrative.The response gives an accurate summary of at least one outside reference on why this healthcare problem is significant and should be on the legislative agenda. At least one outside resource and 2-3 course-specific materials are included in the response to support the summary presented.
The nurse’s role in setting the agenda for healthcare concerns is well-supported by the responses.
27 (25%) – 25 (25%) – 25 (25%) – 25 (25%) – 25 (27 percent )
Creates a partially accurate or incomplete narrative.The response gives a hazy or erroneous overview of outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare problem is essential and should be on the legislative agenda. The response incorporates resources that may support the provided summary to the bare minimum.
The comments somewhat justify the nurse’s role in setting the agenda for healthcare concerns.
24 – 0 (zero percent) (24 percent )
The response gives a hazy and erroneous summary of why this healthcare issue is essential and should be addressed, with no outside resources evaluated.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!